Follow

@MRECheese
No problem with the idea of removing abortions, though the cost should be to add support for those who cannot afford a child.

It is a financial and psychological burden to raise a child. The hypothesis is that more financially and psychological mothers abort the child. Though if one removes the option of aborting, then one should add the option of financial and psychological aid.

There probably are programs out there, though the education about them are also lacking. And assuming that those who are against abortions are also against financial aid of such mothers.

So it seems like a double edged sword issue. One wants it both ways without acknowledging the price.

---
It seems like a big ploy for business and a heavy burden on society. Wondering if giving children up for adoption will go up? Wondering if parents going to jail will go up? What about the rates of SIDS?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.