CERN opens new era in knowledge sharing
In September, CERN approved a new policy for open science, with immediate effect. Developed by the Open Science Strategy Working Group (OSWG), which includes members from CERN departments and experiments, the policy aims to make all CERN research fully accessible, reproducible, inclusive, democratic and transparent for both researchers and wider society.
https://cerncourier.com/a/cern-opens-new-era-in-knowledge-sharing/
An excellent explanation for the Mastodon membership explosion, clearly due to defectors from Twitter because of the unpredictability of its new owner. Defectors is an overstatement as most have not closed their Twitter accounts and are waiting to see what happens next. However, such an uncertainty, coupled with the frequent aggressiveness on the network, has pushed users to explore alternatives.
[via @rickypo] https://twitter.com/rickypo/status/1590232762614943744?s=12&t=KHHJhpQdKQf4DdtQTzZBkw
@bernardrentier open-access, open-data, open & free-software and licencing under a « libre » licence should be the basis of science as it is the only way to be reasonnably sure that science is reproductible
New expectations on DORA signatories from now on 👇
"1) to make a public statement explaining their commitment to DORA;
2) research-performing organizations to ensure their implementation of DORA is informed by ongoing dialogue with staff and students who are involved in research and research-enabling activities.
The policy also states the action that DORA will take should credible reports be received of a signatory organization not living up to these expectations."
New to #OpenScience ? A free short e-textbook (also available in French) with the basics.
https://academie-editions.be/accueil/369-open-science-the-challenge-of-transparency.html
[Published in 2019 by the Royal Academy of Belgium Editions, foreword by Philippe Busquin (former European Commissioner for Research). Selected by the EC Toolbox of Open Science. Winner of the « Prix 2019 du Livre politique », Belgium].
Exclusive: Elsevier retracting 500 papers for shoddy peer review
This articles asks if the principles of open source and open access are sufficient to safeguard our intellectual labor and to guard against the predatory logic of a world dominated by capitalist systems of production and dissemination. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/victorians-institute/article/doi/10.5325/victinstj.49.2022.0198/319226/Going-a-Step-Further-Than-Open-Access-and-Open
The Commission signs the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment and endorses the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment - #OpenScience #ResearchAssessment #ResearchCareerAssessment - https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/commission-signs-agreement-reforming-research-assessment-and-endorses-san-francisco-declaration-2022-11-08_en
Mastodon will update to 4.0 soon! Here are the most exciting new features (in addition to fixes & changes):
- ability to follow hashtags
- ability to filter by language
- ability to translate posts
- ability to post HEIC files (i.e. your iPhone’s native photo format)
- define user roles (big deal for admins)
- define sign-up process on your Instance (admins again)
See all changes here: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/releases/tag/v4.0.0rc1
Thanks, @Gargron and @Mastodon Team. #Mastodon4
Maybe we shouldn't see this growing community here at #mastodon (solely) as a direct result of #musk buying #twitter and more as a chance to get connections, exchange and social media back into the hands of all people and away from #coorporations
The danger of inaccuracies remaining in a peer-reviewed article is that the reader's guard may be down and their professional skepticism not be what it would be for a preprint ("it has been peer-reviewed, hasn't it? Does that not guarantee that it's correct?"). That makes inaccuracies in peer-reviewed articles more dangerous than those in preprints.
Citizen Science as the new paradigm for Science Communication. « Smells like team spirit: how citizen science can succeed ». https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/442432-smells-like-team-spirit-how-citizen-science-can-succeed However, the biggest difficulty is that popularised science is not science and never will be. But if one remains aware of this, popularised science is preferable to no-science or forged science.
Open Access, Rights Retention Strategy
Interesting to see this published behind a paywall at Nature Genetics
The authors have used the rights retention strategy, the statement is clearly there in the acknowledgements (which sit outside the paywall at this journal). But I can't yet find the full text open copy they have the right to upload to EuropePMC.
Paywalled version: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01204-x
EuropePMC entry for it: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/36333503
@marind Personally I shall use les deux sur un seul compte ! 😉
Two principles currently govern the work of the digital humanities: open access and open source.
COVE (Collaborative Organization for Virtual Education, covecollective.org, subscribes to both principles: supporting an open-access publication platform, COVE Editions, and using and modifying open-source tools.
https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/victorians-institute/article/doi/10.5325/victinstj.49.2022.0198/319226/Going-a-Step-Further-Than-Open-Access-and-Open
*Our future depends on the sharing of intellectual resources*
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20221103132315898
« Governments around the world are increasingly wanting to control and specify the role of universities, and so having a global voice which is independent of national or regional interests is becoming even more important ».
[Thanks to Richard Poynder, on Twitter !]
Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics
Controverses sur les connaissances et les politiques liées au COVID.
Pour contrer la menace que représentent les médecins et les scientifiques qui contestent la position officielle des autorités sanitaires gouvernementales et intergouvernementales, des partisans de cette orthodoxie ont entrepris de censurer ceux qui défendent des points de vue divergents.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-022-09479-4
Petit rappel pour les nouveaux : Les messages privés ont la sécurité d'une carte postale.
- Les admins (actuels et futurs) de votre serveur peuvent les lire.
- Les admin (actuels et futurs) du serveur de votre interlocuteur peuvent les lire aussi.
- S'il y a un jour une faille de sécurité sur un des deux serveurs, les messages sont en clair.
Si c'est vraiment privé, utilisé un autre canal de communication.
Note : C'est aussi vrai sur twitter.
En effet, un guide Mastodon fort utile.
As Musk reshapes Twitter, academics ponder taking flight - https://www.science.org/content/article/musk-reshapes-twitter-academics-ponder-taking-flight
🇫🇷 Virologiste, ancien Recteur ULiège 🇧🇪 (2005-2014)
🇬🇧 Virologist, Rector Emeritus ULiège 🇧🇪 (2005-2014)
🇫🇷 Défenseur de l’accès libre aux publications scientifiques, de la Science ouverte et de la liberté d’expression des chercheurs dans leur domaine de compétence.
🇬🇧 Advocate for Open Access, Open Science and freedom of expression for researchers in their field of expertise.