Show newer

« Even within the scientific community, the reliability of sources and data is a difficult question to answer » sciencedirect.com/science/arti

Purpose :Analyze the relationships between discourse leading indicators and citations from perspectives of integrating altmetrics indicators. 2. Provide references for comprehending the quantitative indicators of scientific communication in the era of , constructing the evaluation indicator system of the discourse leading for academic journals and then improving the discourse leading of academic journals.
emerald.com/insight/content/do

Strikes me we really need a better terminology for retractions. Because honest error shouldn’t be thrown in the same bin as deliberate falsehood.

Unless we honour the honourable retraction we promote science-for-glory over science-for-knowledge.

the-scientist.com/news-opinion
HT @ElisabethBik on Twitter

More evidence that articles published in #OpenAccess journal are cited more often than articles published in #paywalled journals. But at the same time, evidence that availability on #SciHub is reducing the OA citation advantage (#OACA) for OA journals.
researchsquare.com/article/rs-

Research Software vs. Research Data I: Towards a Research Data definition in the context - f1000research.com/articles/11-

is encouraging the publication of null or negative results for it is the best way to avoid spending time, energy and money repeating unnecessary experiments. junanaguy.medium.com/the-unrea

« U.S. Biomedical federal funding has offered support to approximately two-thirds of the top-cited biomedical scientists at some point during the last quarter century, but only a small minority of top-cited scientists had current federal biomedical funding.» jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman

@bernardrentier @rickypo Yes! "My local council doesn’t bother telling me when a road is open and I am able to drive down it. They only bother to erect a sign when it’s a dead end, a cul de sac, or no entry. Surely the world should by now have shifted to expecting OA without it having to be specifically labelled?" I don't think we're there yet but we should be.

"More than our rank".
This is an initiative that every university would do well to join, regardless of its ranking.
Indeed, each institution, for various reasons, many of which are its own, is worth much more than the rank assigned to it by a limited, indigent and ideologically connoted system of indicators.
inorms.net/more-than-our-rank/

« Surely after 20+ years, we have reached the tipping point when OA should be considered the default, if not the norm »
coalition-s.org/blog/open-acce
[via @rickypo]

The impact factor of scientific journals, although having long been severely criticised as a tool for evaluating research and researchers, is still broadly used as a gold standard. Now it is caught in its own trap in the excitement of COVID.
preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.