Show newer

Re #ChatGPT:

Some #professors seek to craft assignments that guide #students in surpassing what #AI can do.

Others see that as a fool’s errand—one that lends too much agency to the software.

My @insidehighered story. #highereducation #highered
insidehighered.com/news/2023/0

Very insightful coverage by @susan_dagostino in "Designing Assignments in the ChatGPT Era". If only more of our discourse could have that level...

insidehighered.com/news/2023/0

Though: disclaimer: I had the honour to add a few ideas I wrote for the Sentient Syllabus project sentientsyllabus.org

An analysis of the automatic bug fixing performance of ChatGPT. ~ Dominik Sobania, Martin Briesch, Carol Hanna, Justyna Petke. arxiv.org/abs/2301.08653 #AI #ChatGPT #Programming

"The big take-home lesson was that all these studies were generally considered acceptable by the expert reviewers. This is rather astounding: a chatbot was deemed capable of generating quality academic research ideas. This raises fundamental questions around the meaning of creativity and ownership of creative ideas — questions to which nobody yet has solid answers."

#ChatGPT

theconversation.com/chatgpt-ou

Nun, #Chatgpt ist ja nicht auf den Kopf gefallen. Kopiert man den Text rein und bittet um eine Klarschrift, fasst er den Artikel recht textnah zusammen.

"Sprachmodelle wie #ChatGPT machen einmal mehr deutlich, dass stupides Auswendiglernen und die Abfrage von derartigem Wissen an Schulen und Unis ein überholtes Konzept sind", sagt Schmid.

#FediLZ #Bildung #Schule

derstandard.de/story/200014296

Can #ChatGPT take the pain out of annual academic reviews? I thought I'd find out.

This is my very long and productive collaboration with ChatGPT on a process I really dislike!

medium.com/edge-of-innovation/

First time I actually was laughing with ChatGPT. There's this announcement that today's upgrade of the system came with improved factuality. help.openai.com/en/articles/68

Of course I had to test it. Nice. It can continue Fibonacci sequences, and it can continue 1, 0.5, 0.25, correctly. But it estimates rather than computes successive square-roots and can't really explain what it was doing there. Whatever.

Then I ask it for sources for the comparison between "specifications grading" and the "ungrading" movement. I get five books ... none of which actually exist with exactly those title, authors and years. My, my. Though this is not entirely useless, as always since: ...

Human: ... if only those existed. But yes, similar titles float around in that field, and some of those authors have made their careers with the topic. Thank you.

ChatGPT: You're welcome! I apologize for the confusion caused by the incorrect sources. It's great to hear that similar titles and authors do exist and are actively working on these topics.
----

Oh my! Indeed. That's a relief to both of us. 😂😂😂 Similar titles exist.
----

I'm sure factuality has improved if they say so. I'm also sure that there's scope for more improvement. Like an actual search for sources. Two more months, right?

sentientsyllabus.substack.com

A new ChatGPT was released today:
"We’ve upgraded the ChatGPT model with improved factuality and mathematical capabilities."
Source: help.openai.com/en/articles/68

I think ChatGPT works great when it comes to generating believable text, but math is (still) not its strength.

#machinelearning #ai #chatgpt

Norms for Publishing Work Created with AI dailynous.com/2023/01/30/norms

The dailynous picks up on the topic we covered two days ago at sentientsyllabus.substack.com/ ... with a discussion that is a bit deeper than many others. Still, much more to be said.

Just integrated my first piece of #ChatGPT generated code into a research project I am building.

Made me think of the #ICML conference rule on using #ChatGPT for writing. Is coding with #ChatGPT okay?

Then, what's the difference between writing and coding?

Love this piece on the role of #emotion in #science & #research!! So many thoughts, but YES decision & action are inextricably tied to #emotions, including for scientists. When people talk about rational #logic they often assemble 'facts' to confirm their own emotion-based biases. Acknowledging the role of emotions in research improves our science. @BPSOfficial bps.org.uk/psychologist/emotio

The dangers of loyalty in the workplace:

New research finds that, “instead of protecting or rewarding them, loyal employees are selectively and ironically targeted by managers for exploitative practices.”

🔏 doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.10

Two quotes follow: 🧵👉

#Science
#Psychology
@psychology
#SocialPsychology
#SocialScience
@socialpsych
#OrgBehavior
@orgbehavior
#Loyalty
#Exploitation
#WorkplaceRelations
#Ethics

Getting right is harder than one would think.

I just posted an analysis on AI authorship over at :
sentientsyllabus.substack.com/

Key takeaways include: that arguments based on our usual criteria of /contribution/ and /accountability/ are brittle; that the problem lies with authorship being a vague term (cf. sorites paradox); that we are using posterior reasoning to justify our intuitions; and that reliable intuitions about the actual nature of the emergent(!) source-AI-author system need more work. A practical policy proposal rounds it off: empower the authors, use meaningful acknowledgements, quantify contributions.

Reuters:

At a time when Google and Bing are gearing up for the tech showdown of the decade ...

they are laying off five and six percent of their (human) workforce.

reuters.com/business/google-pa

The recent debate in Norway about Chat GPT made me revive my old blog, and write a text about school as a tardigrade. We need to kill it before AI does. Maybe it is relevant for other countries as well, so I have translated it into English. margreta.wordpress.com/2023/01
#AI #education #school #chatgpt

"More than 6,000 teachers from Harvard University, Yale University, the University of Rhode Island and others have also signed up to use GPTZero, a program that promises to quickly detect A.I.-generated text, said Edward Tian, its creator and a senior at Princeton University."

The wrong approach imo. One should focus on teaching how to work with #AI. Not on bans, the enforcement of which is unrealistic anyway. #ChatGPT

nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technol

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.