🇳🇱
@snark_web@mastodon.social Agreed. Which is EXACTLY what I said. So I assume this toot was just to agree with what I said or did I misunderstand you?
@freemo @snark_web you're using language that implies that trans women's sexes or genitals are somehow notable, since the original post did not mention either thing
@metapianycist I'm sorry the way I worded it mislead you to that conclusion. I should have been more clear. That is not what i was saying.
I was attempting to point out that a persons sex is no ones business.
@snark_web@mastodon.social
@freemo @snark_web i know that you had good intentions. I'm saying that since the original post did not mention sex or genitals, your mentioning those things (even to say they're none of anyone's business) has the effect that other people could read your comments and think that trans women's genitals/sex are relevant or notable in determining whether or not they are women
@metapianycist @snark_web@mastodon.social Ahh, I see. That certainly wasnt my intention and I would be very disappointed if that was the effect my post had. As you probably realized by now my intention was the exact opposite of that.
