so clearly capital and the state think that "AI" is magic w/ AI crime prediction, age verification, peer review, etc. etc. knowing that it's not an unqualified "belief" (ie. capital thinks AI is magic when it is good for capital), how can that perception and the legal gray area it exists in be exploited?

@jonny hi, just a check here on the meaning of "capital" -> capital city? centre? politically where government is?
(perhaps all these things?)

And are you asking
- how AI can be good for capital's self?
- how can that perception (capital's perception I think you mean?) and the legal gray area it exists in be exploited? (like against them or against people?)

@freeschool
capital as in capitalism. how can the perception of AI being "magic" (eg. "age detection algorithms veridically measure age") be used for good (ie. liberation from capital) given the state of beliefs and the legal indeterminacy of the status of AI applications

Follow

@jonny
I think it can't be used for good when it's used by pure-profit people.

If profit only is the main factor and those only seeking to do more 'efficient' job in that (i.e get more tax or more production)... then it's no use.
It might help give an example also as to which perspective or who you might mean if I don't have it quite right.
If it's from perspective of "we the people" or any ideal humans things, then none of increments are ever good, they just add/speed things up/multiply more tools on their side in an already bad chess game where their other pieces and tools also make things inflexible to any non-profit change.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.