josemanuel @josemanuel@qoto.org

Quería recomendarle espacios en Madrid, pero todos los que encuentro parecen de ínfima calidad o están abandonados. Si tenéis sugerencias, poneos en contacto con él (y mencionadme a mí para que me entere yo también). Gracias.

@veer66 You're more than welcome to try it. I'm very happy here myself.

@veer66 It sure does. It is me who doesn't know much about it. I wish qoto supported Org mode instead. I learned about it just last week and already I'm more familiar with it than with Markdown. Anyway, I should've posted a screenshot. You know what? I'm going to do just that.

@veer66 I don't know. Maybe? I know nothing about Nostr, to be honest.

@metalcrow That certainly explains why I'm such a slow reader. Thanks for sharing it!

@smaurizi If there is really a difference, why didn't Obama pardon Julian as he pardoned Chelsea Manning? Also, when did Correa step down as President of Ecuador?

@veer66 Sorry, I see the formating got mangled. My Markdown-fu is pretty weak.

@veer66 You could write a multiline shebang that doesn't have to be specific to SBCL, like this:

```
#| -*- Lisp -*-
case "$LISP" in

allegro) ${ALLEGRO:-alisp} -qq -e "(setf *load-verbose* nil)" -L "$0" -- "$@" ;;

ccl) exec ${CCL:-ccl} --no-init --load "$0" -- "$@" ;;

clisp) exec ${CLISP:-clisp} -norc -q "$0" "$@" ;;

""|sbcl) exec ${SBCL:-sbcl} --noinform --no-userinit --no-sysinit --script "$0" "$@" ;;

*) echo >&2 "Unknown Lisp $LISP" ; exit 2
esac ; exit
|#
```

I don't remember where I copied it from (probably from ASDF source code) and it is probably a bashism, but it works.

@veer66 I once had an idea for a kind of nomadic identity: users would keep everything about their accounts local in their computers, including a private key, and instances (all instances, not just the one where they signed on) would host their public keys, so they could login and post from whatever instance they wanted at any point.

I never gave it much more thought than that, so maybe it was a stupid idea.

@Nora@tiflo.social No, yo hablaba de gente que publica algo sólo para sus seguidores (porque quiere que quede más o menos en privado, supongo). A veces yo contesto a ese tipo de cosas (por ejemplo, para preguntar o para abundar en el tema) y la mayoría de las veces no recibo ningún tipo de respuesta. A todos los efectos es como si la otra persona ni siquiera me hubiera leído.

Mi duda era si a lo mejor contestar a estos mensajes está mal visto o es de mala educación. Al fin y al cabo, si les dan esa visibilidad, será porque no quieren discutir el asunto más allá de lo que ellos mismos comparten. Quizá lo vean como una intrusión en su intimidad.

Is it bad form to reply to followers-only posts? I ask because I usually don't get any response from the other person, be it a reply or an acknowledgement of any kind.

@louis@emacs.ch If you had a hard time with Go, let me tell you about the kind of infrastructure I have to maintain to test a simple PHP library.

Does anyone know how to make Mutt work with Org mode (or vice versa)? I looked it up and I found a few old blog posts, but the code in them is incomplete. I'm an Org newbie. I only started using it last week, but I appreciate any guidance you could give me.

#emacs #orgmode #mutt

@riley http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/TEXE

I hate the _Fire Emblem_ series with a passion! In all their games there's always one battle where difficulty takes a huge exponential leap and I'm sick of it. “Oh, so you've managed to keep your whole party alive up until now? Let''s try this new approach where you have to fight several bosses so powerful that, in sheer desperation, you'll have to sacrifice your friends if you want to move on.” “Oh, you managed to beat that with only a few losses? And you thought you could go back to base and regroup somehow? Why don't we take your powers away and have you fight another battle just for the thrill of it? But this time with dragons!”