Follow


Name: GRACE-REC

Spatial coverage: global

Spatial resolution: 0.5 degrees

Temporal coverage: MSWEP-based reconstruction 1979-2016, ERA5-based 1979-present, GSWP3-based 1901-2014

Temporal resolution: Monthly (100 ensemble members for each combination of the three meteorological datasets and two GRACE satellite mascons), daily (ensemble mean only)

Gap-free: Yes

Year of publication: 2019

Algorithm: (1) linear water storage model, driven by temperature and precipitation, calibrated against de-seasonalized, de-trendedd GRACE satellite data (2002-2017), (2) spatial autoregressive model was used to generate an ensemble of spatially autocorrelated residuals, to facilitate uncertainty propagation from grid-level to regional or global averages. This method to propagate uncertainty is noteworthy.

Pros: outperforms hydrological and land surface models when evaluated against de-seasonalized, de-trended GRACE terrestrial water data, sea-level budget, basin-scale water balance, and streamflow.

Cons: The trends in GRACE-REC is purely driven by precipitation changes, therefore missing a ton of relevant factors (evapotranspiration change, dams, human water withdrawal, ice melt...). The seasonality is constant and not particularly reliable, either.

essd.copernicus.org/articles/1

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.