The ORCID branding guidelines are super strict. They even mention trademarks violations. It seems like smaller projects like Fidus Writer might be better off steering clear. Is there an alternative out there that's more open and accessible for smaller projects? #openaccess #ORCID
https://info.orcid.org/brand-guidelines/#h-orcid-logos-and-icons
@fiduswriter I do not understand the problem you are facing. Could you detail a bit ? Many thanks.
@fresseng Their wording is not very clear, but there are clearly consequences for non-compliance. For example:
* It's forbidden to write the words "Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier" (?)
* Users should not be able to copy their own id (?!)
* ORCIDs have to be verified (how long ago?) and a specific logo has to be used under some conditions.
For a small org it's a minefield and we cannot afford a possible lawsuit. Therefore it's probably best not to integrate ORCID into FW & similar.
@fiduswriter I feel that these rules are quite standard for branding. In your example, the first tells you that ORCID does not want to be spelled out. The second one indicates that you need to use the ORCID API to get that author authenticated through it so that you remove any possibility of error in the ORCID ID. The third one again tells you to use only verified (or API authenticated ID) or specify it if you do not.
To use the internationally accepted identifier in confidence without fearing lawsuit, you can directly ask @ORCID_Org, though I feel that if you do something wrong, you will at worst get a gentle reminder.
@fiduswriter @ORCID_Org Though I do not agree, the simple fact that you feel like it implies that it is a problem that needs to be addressed. Thanks for the warning !