So… taking a text under copyright and using it to populate a simple Markov Chain and using that to generate gibberish is … infringing copyright? Ethically dubious? None of the above? Asking for a friend.

@alex The populating of the Markov Chain is creating a derived work, and I would say that making it generate gibberish from it does as well, though the opinions vary on this one and you need a judge decision in practice. Then, whether that is a copyright infringement depends on what you do with the gibberish. Copyright is all about publishing things. If you never publish it anywhere, you are fine.

I would say the ethics of this depend on what you do with it even more.

Follow

@deshipu
Good point. I was just thinking that serving gibberish URLs on bot request with a generic copyright-respective-authors disclaimer would be totally fine. Of course, it would be better to use material copyrighted by corporates!
@alex

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.