Show newer

A few days ago during the discussion on nature.com/articles/s41467-024 we completely missed this excellent summary chemistryworld.com/news/elevat

(h/t @semiotic_pirate via @EricCarroll )

with these VERY communicable findings:

"at 3000ppm, the final 30% of the initial aerosolised virus decays at an incredibly slow rate – it practically stops decaying relative to typical indoor ventilation."

and

"where the carbon dioxide concentration was set to 3000ppm – routinely reached in crowded spaces such as UK primary schools – and at 500ppm. They found that overall decay is much slower at the higher carbon dioxide concentration where there was 10 times more virus after 40 minutes."

and also points out a potential flaw, in that "the droplets they study are – at more than 10μm – much larger than the respiratory aerosol particles in which most Sars-CoV-2 has been found, which are less than 1μm. [Some] researchers believe that for typical indoor air composition and smaller aerosol particles, these particles will turn acidic rather than alkaline, something that was discussed further during peer review."

and - for all you fellow mega nerds out there - I'm finding that peer review (static-content.springer.com/es) very educational!

#SARS2 #COVID19 #CovidIsNotOver #COVID #CO2 #CleanTheAir

@grumpasaurus
The labor force part is a red herring, mostly about ignoring retirees. Here's disabled population overall. Basically COVID created 4 million newly disabled people

Microplastics Found in Blood Clots in Heart, Brain, And Legs sciencealert.com/microplastics

The evidence on the impact of microplastics on human health is growing. But will anything be done to stop the highly profitable production of plasitcs?

Puerto Rico COVID-19, 23 de mayo de 2024. Muertes reportadas hoy: 2. tasa de positividad (PCR): 17.15% y subiendo. Menos de 03% de la población está al día con la vacunación. #vacunateya #pontemascarilla #mastodonPR 🇵🇷

theguardian.com/society/articl
Yes #Ultraprocessedfoods are bad but seriously ZERO mention of #covid plus coincidentally the increase was calculated from 6 years ago.. how convenient🙄

It was the msm article on very young children suddenly developing #diabetes #postCovid in either 2020 or 2021 that made me extremely alarmed, sit up & pay attention

Tbh I don’t think an Ebola outbreak would alarm anybody anymore

Yeah sure. I’m the crazy one. Keep telling yourselves that as you repeatedly get #justACold

@ixtility@urbanists.social

I found the BBC article I had looked at before. My takeaway is that what we called "mask mandates" in the US were probably "face covering rules" in the UK, but if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will tell me :)

bbc.com/news/health-51205344

@ixtility@urbanists.social

That's totally fair, and I did wonder this at one point and did a little looking into it. The BBC, at least, distinguished between them in an article, so I made the assumption. I still could be wrong!

I know I've disparaged Trish Greenhalgh here previously for a couple of things, but, specifically refusing to say the word "mask" before, and instead using "face coverings" in places like her Oxford bio. So it's only fair that I post about her latest paper. I'd reply directly to where I said that before, but I can't search on this instance and I can't find it.

This is really good work, and specifically discusses different masks and respirators clearly.

journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/c

the shutdowns were worse than the disease people will say things like "all of my problems are from that one time I played Abe's Oddysee for twelve hours straight"

@PartPurple

You're right, but, also, the way it was nearly enforced on my wife was that the grocery store called the cops about a woman following my wife around, and then the cop decided once she was in the parking lot she was violating the law. Scary times.

@Laukidh

I always appreciate more info an hadn't seen that one yet 👍

@Laukidh

Thank you for sharing that! I'd read both 8 and 13 in other articles, so I thought I was safe with "at least 8" but I'll see how it shakes out and correct accordingly. While I don't want to put out wrong info, I think the fact that it was anyone is the main takeaway here.

And here we go. Thanks to a couple of people for pointing this article out to me this morning.

sun-sentinel.com/2024/04/29/po

At least 8 people in Florida were charged with wearing a mask in public during these protests.

Show thread

@PacificNic

Even when I started this thread, just 17 months ago, I was just starting to see it, too. I'm afraid that's where everywhere is headed, but I sincerely hope to be wrong. Maybe I just, somehow, have a seriously unhealthy cohort of friends and family, even though they mostly eat healthy, hike and work out a lot, etc.

I mean, if we take my wife's friend here, she lives in California, eats super healthy, is probably a medically perfect weight, goes to the gym every morning etc. This is not the person you would suspect to have health problems outside of a raging pandemic.

Having slept on this, and discussed over tea with my wife, we realized that with this latest health situation, we now can't think of a single person whom we interact with in real life that hasn't had a new onset health problem in the last 4 years. Not. One.

Small sample size, for sure, especially because we keep a small family and friend circle(we're both only children, for example). They range in age from my wife's friend, in just her 30's and now probably dealing with PEM, to my dad who is now in his upper 70's. We, literally, can't think of one person who we would describe as "fine" at this point.

I know it's not a statistically important sample size, but, if you really step back, imagine May of 2019, and think hard about it, who would have thought we'd be saying that 5 years later? And that everyone would say that it's normal and acceptable?

This week in 2019 we were preparing for a huge trip. We had Amtrak tickets and rental cars all lined up, and we visited 14 states, and spent some time in Washington DC, on a genealogical expedition throughout the whole summer. It was probably the best trip of our lives.

Mind blowing. That's all.

Show thread

A Word of Advice if you
intend on using/trying Microsoft's newly announced Recall feature :windows: :

Be *extremely* careful with the data of others.

Recording your own data is one thing, but if you continuously use a feature that will record others on video conferences, chat conversations, and emails, without explicit consent, you could get in a lot of trouble.

Not only this can be extremely unethical (to say the least), but it could also expose you to serious legal consequences.

Remember:

1. Be careful: The use of this feature might not even be legal in some locations/situations/circumstances. If you use it, you should verify this first.

2. Consent should always be free, explicit, and revocable.

3. Once you collect the data of others, you become its guardian. You have a responsibility to secure it properly, for as long as you keep it. This is a heavy burden.

4. The easiest and safest course of action is to simply not collect this data in the first place.

In that sense, I highly recommend NOT using features such as Microsoft's Recall.

This is a data privacy disaster waiting to happen. For others, and for yourself.

#Privacy #Recall #Microsoft :2001:

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/0

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.