Solutions Dems should strongly consider:
- More direct acknowledgment of threats to democratic institutions
- Broader deployment of "brand ambassadors" to reach diverse audiences
- Enhanced focus on authentic, unfiltered communication
- Better utilization of existing evidence to counter opposition narratives
Thanks for reading 🔖
3. Institutional Responses
Dem leadership can be criticized for:
- Failing to develop compelling populist messaging post-Obama era
- Maintaining overly curated, sanitized communication strategies when voters desire "unvarnished" truth
- Not effectively utilizing existing evidence (e.g., Mueller report) to counter opposition narratives
- Lacking message discipline and unified strategic communications
2. Foreign Policy Impact
- The October 7th attacks and subsequent Israeli-Palestinian conflict significantly affected electoral dynamics
- This crisis reportedly provided opportunities for adversaries to target educational institutions and shape public discourse
Those hunting for perceived failures of Democratic messaging and strategy during this election cycle should focus on three main factors:
1. Information Warfare
- Primary concern: Russian disinformation campaigns operated through domestic intermediaries
- Notable actors included social media influencers allegedly receiving substantial compensation to shape public opinion
- Democratic leadership has failed to effectively acknowledge or counter this information warfare
I argue that Dem weakness stems not primarily from policy failures, but from:
- Inadequate response to coordinated disinformation campaigns
- Reluctance to directly confront perceived threats to democratic institutions
- Insufficient engagement with younger voters and modern communication channels
- Over-reliance on traditional messaging strategies in a rapidly evolving information environment
I am Robert M. Powell. My degrees are in Zoology and Environmental Science, with a lot of chemistry courses thrown in, which was fortunate because almost all my professional work has involved extremely detailed chemistry, including some chemical reactions in experiments that hadn't been described before. I’m also a consultant, so get in touch if my expertise matches your needs.
I currently teach environmental science courses at three colleges. I had a very long career prior to becoming a professor, with over 40 years of experience. Here are some highlights:
- Two years as a senior technician in a genetics research lab.
- Eleven years at the Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS) as an Analytical Chemist.
- Eleven years as a Researcher at USEPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ada, OK.
- Twenty-four years as an environmental consultant via Powell & Associates Science Services.
- Seven years+ (so far) as a professor at three colleges.
My expertise includes aqueous chemistry, ground water geochemistry, contaminant remediation using permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) in the subsurface and other innovative in situ treatment technologies, ground water sampling, site characterization, contaminant transport and fate, including colloidal contaminant transport, analytical chemistry, exploratory data analysis, risk assessment, technical writing and editing, and providing expert witness support for clients on a variety of environmental topics under litigation. One of my fascinations is sorting out complex data using exploratory data analysis software.
At the OGS I analyzed large numbers of environmental samples, including rocks, coal, surface water, ground water, water from deep sea sediments, uranium levels in ore, and so on; I programmed computers to do the calculations.
At EPA, my emphasis was in surface water and subsurface systems including soil, the unsaturated zone above the aquifers, and ground water, including the transport of contaminants adsorbed onto colloidal particles and as chelates. I was involved in the research and development of low-flow rate and passive purging and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells. I also worked on the development and understanding of the geochemical mechanisms, reaction rates, costs and approaches to in situ contaminant remediation using permeable reactive barrier technology, authoring many reports and peer-reviewed papers in the process. Both these methods are now being used worldwide, for which I get nothing because my work was government-funded, LOL.
As a consultant I have had numerous clients from industry, legal teams, Native American tribes, other consultancies, and government, both local and federal. One of my favorite projects was serving as a member of the six-person External Advisory Group for the Hydrogeologic Workplan at the Los Alamos National Laboratory for seven years; I got to go to New Mexico at least twice per year and I love it there, both the scenery and the stupendously good Mexican food.
About three years ago, I was subcontracted to Michigan Technological University for the State of Michigan. Michigan Tech was contracted to develop a worst-case scenario risk assessment for the Mackinac Straits Line 5 pipelines owned by Enbridge, Inc., should they rupture and release large amounts of oil. I worked on the ecosystems part of the risk assessment.
I've authored 40+ publications, book chapters, and encyclopedia articles and lost count of my professional presentations at around 50 or so.