Show newer

I urge colleagues to abandon NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports as scientific outlets for new work. If Elsevier continues these journals, do not serve on their editorial boards and do not submit new articles to them. Elsevier has no power to profit from us if we simply say No.

Show thread

Following Elsevier's decision to raise the article processing charge for NeuroImage to $3,450, all editors (inc. chief editors) from NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports have resigned, effective immediately.

I am joining this action and have also resigned.

Full announcement: imaging-neuroscience.org/Annou

RT @ImagingNeurosci
All NeuroImage and NeuroImage:Reports editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal

imaging-neuroscience.org

This comes with great regret, and a huge amount of thought and discussion- please read announcement to get more details.

Reading a review paper by an early stage faculty member and their trainees that ignores over a decade of similar research by other researchers. Review paper makes it seem like they came up with the concept. Already received multiple emails from people in the field mad over the treatment of their research in the review. Do we reach out to the assistant professor or just let it go?

New paper on auditing Elon's early impact on Twitter.
- Hateful users became more hateful
- Hate increased dramatically
- There was no overall change in bots

Paper (accepted to ICWSM 2023) is here:
arxiv.org/abs/2304.04129

New paper out by recent PhD grad from my lab. It is possible to get clean EEG sources from playing table tennis. Large differences in parietal-occipital regions between returning serve from a ball machine and returning serve from a human. Senorimotor cortex is pretty similar for two tasks. Data set is online in BIDS format for those interested in performing new analyses (e.g. competitive and cooperative conditions) doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0463-22

Parieto-Occipital Electrocortical Dynamics during Real-World Table Tennis

Traditional human electroencephalography experiments that study visuomotor processing use controlled laboratory conditions with limited ecological validity. In the real world, the brain integrates complex, dynamic, multimodal visuomotor cues to guide the execution of movement. The parietal and occipital cortices are especially important in the online control of goal-directed actions. Table tennis is a whole-body, responsive activity requiring rapid visuomotor integration that presents a myriad of unanswered neurocognitive questions about brain function during real world movement. The aim of this study was to quantify the electrocortical dynamics of the parieto-occipital cortices while playing a sport with high-density electroencephalography. We included analysis of power spectral densities, event-related spectral perturbations, intertrial phase coherences, event-related potentials, and event-related phase coherences of parieto-occipital source-localized clusters while participants played table tennis with a ball machine and a human. We found significant spectral power fluctuations in the parieto-occipital cortices tied to hit events. Ball machine trials exhibited more fluctuations in theta power around hit events, an increase in intertrial phase coherence and deflection in the event-related potential, and higher event-related phase coherence between parieto-occipital clusters as compared to trials with a human. Our results suggest that sport training with a machine elicits fundamentally different brain dynamics than training with a human. Significance Statement Analyzing high-density scalp EEG from human participants playing table tennis allowed us to examine the precise timing of electrocortical changes in the parieto-occipital cortices during a whole body visuomotor task with high ecological validity. Time-frequency and connectivity analyses revealed earlier broadband desynchronization, more evidence of phase-locked activity, and an increase in coherence between brain regions in ball machine trials than in human trials. These differences likely reflect how humans interpret body and machine cues regarding the trajectory and speed of the oncoming ball, which may have important implications in sport training.

doi.org

I am really confused in the field of machine learning right now. Like really. This is the field that likes to gate keep other fields who are not "technical" or whatever, and we're seeing papers advertising evaluation datasets that are the outputs of other models.

Like machine translation training and evaluation datasets that are the outputs of other machine translation systems.

What happened to the BASIC concept of not testing on your training set?

Or anything related to learning theory?

NSF panel reviewing proposals for Integrative Strategies for Understanding Neural and Cognitive Systems (NCS) this May is in need of reviewers. Contact jfritz@nsf.gov if you are willing to help. Info on program here: beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportuni

In her #JEB100 ECR Spotlight, Jennifer Leestma tells us about her research into how people recover from a stumble and why she thinks that 'Angular momentum in human walking’ published by Herr and Popovic in JEB in 2008 is already a classic

#biomechanics

journals.biologists.com/jeb/ar

I love this answer by Orson Welles about entering into something new. It has relevance to scientists deciding to study something they weren’t trained in.

75% of scientists are burned out and pulling back on conferences, peer review, committee membership, etc nature.com/articles/d41586-023

When scientists set boundaries, it not only improves their own personal well-being, but also creates norms that limits are acceptable and healthy

RT @David__J__Clark
NIH funded post-doc position in neural control of walking. Come join a great team in sunny Gainesville Florida! 🌞🌴 For details please send me a direct message.

Is it common for faculty members to go back and reread their just submitted grant proposals, knowing they will find things they don't like and can't change? Asking for a friend.

I am a cognitive neuroscientist who focuses on how the mind and brain change during healthy aging. I use cognitive tasks along with eye-tracking, fMRI, and EEG to determine how age differences in attentional control contribute to memory impairments. #introduction #cognition #neuroscience

Neuromodulation of Neural Oscillations in Health and Disease
mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/3/371

Neuromodulation of Neural Oscillations in Health and Disease

Using EEG and local field potentials (LFPs) as an index of large-scale neural activities, research has been able to associate neural oscillations in different frequency bands with markers of cognitive functions, goal-directed behavior, and various neurological disorders. While this gives us a glimpse into how neurons communicate throughout the brain, the causality of these synchronized network activities remains poorly understood. Moreover, the effect of the major neuromodulatory systems (e.g., noradrenergic, cholinergic, and dopaminergic) on brain oscillations has drawn much attention. More recent studies have suggested that cross-frequency coupling (CFC) is heavily responsible for mediating network-wide communication across subcortical and cortical brain structures, implicating the importance of neurotransmitters in shaping coordinated actions. By bringing to light the role each neuromodulatory system plays in regulating brain-wide neural oscillations, we hope to paint a clearer picture of the pivotal role neural oscillations play in a variety of cognitive functions and neurological disorders, and how neuromodulation techniques can be optimized as a means of controlling neural network dynamics. The aim of this review is to showcase the important role that neuromodulatory systems play in large-scale neural network dynamics, informing future studies to pay close attention to their involvement in specific features of neural oscillations and associated behaviors.

www.mdpi.com

All of cortex is motor cortex.

Stimulus representations in visual cortex shaped by spatial attention and microsaccades
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

Stimulus representations in visual cortex shaped by spatial attention and microsaccades

Microsaccades (MSs) are commonly associated with spatially directed attention, but how they affect visual processing is still not clear. We studied MSs in a task in which the animal was randomly cued to attend to a target stimulus and ignore distractors, and it was rewarded for detecting a color change in the target. We found that the enhancement of firing rates normally found with attention to a cued stimulus was delayed until the first MS directed towards that stimulus. Once that MS occurred, attention to the target was engaged and there were persistent effects of attention on firing rates for the remainder of the trial. These effects were found in the superficial and deep layers of V4 as well as the lateral pulvinar and IT cortex. Although the tuning curves of V4 cells do not change depending on the locus of spatial attention, we found pronounced effects of MS direction on stimulus representations that persisted for the length of the trial in V4. In intervals following a MS towards the target in the RF, stimulus decoding from population activity was substantially better than in intervals following a MS away from the target. Likewise, turning curves of cells were substantially sharper following a MS towards the target in the RF. This sharpening appeared to result from both a “refreshing” of the initial transient sensory response to stimulus onset, and a magnification of the effects of attention in this condition. MSs to the target also enhanced the neuronal response to the behaviorally relevant target color change and led to faster reaction times. These results thus reveal a major link between spatial attention, object processing and its coordination with eye movements. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

www.biorxiv.org

Modeling motor control typically requires stitching together multiple neural and biomechanical modeling frameworks.

So, we created MotorNet — a toolbox to study neural architectures/learning, muscle dynamics, delays, noise, and tasks, all under one roof!

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

MotorNet: a Python toolbox for controlling differentiable biomechanical effectors with artificial neural networks

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a powerful class of computational models for unravelling neural mechanisms of brain function. However, for neural control of movement, they currently must be integrated with software simulating biomechanical effectors, leading to limiting impracticalities: (1) researchers must rely on two different platforms and (2) biomechanical effectors are not generally differentiable, constraining researchers to reinforcement learning algorithms despite the existence and potential biological relevance of faster training methods. To address these limitations, we developed MotorNet, an open-source Python toolbox for creating arbitrarily complex, differentiable, and biomechanically realistic effectors that can be trained on user-defined motor tasks using ANNs. MotorNet is designed to meet several goals: ease of installation, ease of use, a high-level user-friendly API, and a modular architecture to allow for flexibility in model building. MotorNet requires no dependencies outside Python, making it easy to get started with. For instance, it allows training ANNs on typically used motor control models such as a two joint, six muscle, planar arm within minutes on a typical desktop computer. MotorNet is built on TensorFlow and therefore can implement any network architecture that is possible using the TensorFlow framework. Consequently, it will immediately benefit from advances in artificial intelligence through TensorFlow updates. Finally, it is open source, enabling users to create and share their own improvements, such as new effector and network architectures or custom task designs. MotorNet's focus on higher order model and task design will alleviate overhead cost to initiate computational projects for new researchers by providing a standalone, ready-to-go framework, and speed up efforts of established computational teams by enabling a focus on concepts and ideas over implementation. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

www.biorxiv.org

A physical neural mass model framework for the analysis of oscillatory generators from laminar electrophysiological recordings
sciencedirect.com/science/arti

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.