Show newer

RT @StephanieRossit
Please RT! Motion-tracking experts - are you using video (from webcams or cameras?) and what software would you recommend to track hand movements based on video?

RT @ShaGilDot
Semester break is here
Exciting talks await for us on March with Profs
Concetta Morrone @Unipisa
Hattar Samer @SamerHattar @NIH
Bat-Sheva Hadad @BatshiH @UofHaifa
Details on shagido.wixsite.com/biu-vs and at @worldwideneuro
@ubarilan @GondaBrain

RT @brian_dekleva
Time for a !

What's the difference (in motor cortex) between performing an action and just imagining it? Turns out, quite a bit (but also, pretty much nothing...)!

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

@RNELabs @jenpgh @raeedcho @aaronbatista @YuLikeNeuro
(1/8)

RT @Ricciardi_Emi
Excited to share our last paper 'A modality-independent proto-organization of human multisensory areas' on @NatureHumBehav
nature.com/articles/s41562-022

I’m planning to attend in San Francisco at the end of March – anyone wants to meet there/around (geographically)?
I want to make informed travel plans and make better use of my carbon footprint
@CNSmtg

RT @ashleyruba
I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: UXR is not the only job for PhDs. The non-ac world is so much bigger than that.

Don't get me wrong, I love UXR. But, given mass layoffs in tech, it's worth considering other careers.

Here are some other amazing options: 1/

RT @crblease
Replication crisis and placebo studies: rebooting the bioethical debate

We hope this paper stimulates constructive and open debate & thoughtful reflection among all interested in studies.

jme.bmj.com/content/early/2023

Replication crisis and placebo studies: rebooting the bioethical debate

A growing body of cross-cultural survey research shows high percentages of clinicians report using placebos in clinical settings. One motivation for clinicians using placebos is to help patients by capitalising on the placebo effect’s reported health benefits. This is not surprising, given that placebo studies are burgeoning, with increasing calls by researchers to ethically harness placebo effects among patients. These calls propose placebos/placebo effects offer clinically significant benefits to patients. In this paper, we argue many findings in this highly cited and ‘hot’ field have not been independently replicated. Evaluating the ethicality of placebo use in clinical practice involves first understanding whether placebos are efficacious clinically. Therefore, it is crucial to consider placebo research in the context of the replication crisis and what can be learnt to advance evidence-based knowledge of placebos/placebo effects and their clinical relevance (or lack thereof). In doing so, our goal in this paper is to motivate both increased awareness of replication issues and to help pave the way for advances in scientific research in the field of placebo studies to better inform ethical evidence-based practice. We argue that, only by developing a rigorous evidence base can we better understand how, if at all, placebos/placebo effects can be harnessed ethically in clinical settings. No data are available. Not applicable.

jme.bmj.com

Great talk from Ed Wasserman today on the analogical abilities of different animal species. Prompted a very interesting discussion on how same/different tasks can be solved in different ways. E.g., comprehending differences in perceptual entropy vs conceptual understanding of same/different.

Recording available here: youtube.com/watch?v=_p7JL3FTdk

Seminar schedule: analogicalminds.com

@cognition @cogsci @psychology #AnimalCognition #ComparativeCognition

RT @HillSchiff
Our paper is out! Instead of the old adage "you are what you eat," we might suggest "you are what you ate". Please enjoy our findings on experience-dependent development of taste preferences during the postnatal period! science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv twitter.com/HillSchiff/status/

RT @mamus_ezgi
Thrilled to share that this paper is finally out ! With @laurajspeed, @wugtask, @asifa_majid, and @ozyurek_a we examined whether lack of visual experience affects multimodal language production. Summary 👇🏾 1/5
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/fu

RT @LuciaMarzia
I am hiring a new PhD student !
Please circulate it widely

wp.unil.ch/lemanicneuroscience

@CHUVLausanne @FBM_UNIL @unil

RT @roger_p_levy
Applications are open (due Feb 15) for MIT Brain & Cognitive Sciences' Post-Baccalaureate Research Scholars Program! Two-year, fully funded, intended for individuals from under-represented groups and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Please retweet! bcs.mit.edu/diversity-equity-a

I'm excited (and late, sorry!) to announce a #LesionSymptomMapping pre-print that @LaurelBuxbaum and I posted in December:

Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

@neuroscience @sensorimotor

Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke

The ability to select between potential actions is central to the complex process of tool use. After left hemisphere stroke, individuals with limb apraxia make more hand action errors when gesturing the use of tools with conflicting hand actions for grasping-to-move and use (e.g., screwdriver) relative to tools that are grasped-to-move and used with the same hand action (e.g., hammer). Prior research indicates that this grasp-use interference effect is driven by abnormalities in the competitive action selection process. The goal of this project was to determine whether common mechanisms and neural substrates support the competitive selection of task-appropriate responses in both tool and non-tool domains. If so, the grasp-use interference effect in a tool use gesturing task should be correlated with response interference effects in the classic Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks, and at least partly overlapping neural regions should subserve the 3 tasks. Sixty-four left hemisphere stroke survivors (33 with apraxia) participated in the tool- and non-tool interference tasks and underwent T1 anatomical MRI. There were robust grasp-use interference effects (grasp-use conflict test) and response interference effects (Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks), but these effects were not correlated. Lesion-symptom mapping analyses showed that lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, and insula were associated with grasp-use interference. Lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus, insula, caudate, and putamen were associated with response interference in the Eriksen flanker task. Lesions to the left caudate and putamen were also associated with response interference in the Simon task. Our results suggest that the selection of hand posture for tool use is mediated by distinct cognitive mechanisms and partly distinct neuroanatomic substrates from those mapping a stimulus to an appropriate motor response in non-tool domains. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

www.biorxiv.org
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.