Show newer

If you're interested in #Buddhism, and especially if you identify as #Buddhist, you might want to follow @ReadingFaithfully_org.

I've been subscribed for some time to Reading Faithfully's email, and look forward to receiving a daily extract from the Buddhist (Pāli) scriptures.

There's a monthly theme. This month's is giving (dāna) and generosity (cāga)

Hi, I am Sven, interested in Philosophy, , "programming" - it's more googling. Actually struggling with and . But working as an advertising copywriter (by accident). Enjoying books from Just reading -richest, , , I lost a bit interest in drinking beer and doing intoxication, which sometimes worries me. Nice to meet you too. :)

Inspirational Quote about Courage and Death 

"The source of true courage in the face of possible death is...the recognition that what we essentially are transcends the limits of the person...gives us the courage to go beyond our individual person and needs."

- Rupert Spira (paraphrased)

#quotes #inspiration #courage #hope #transcendance #mysticism

I'm impressed with the robustness of the mastodon-fediverse so far, under extreme duress.

kudos to the sysadmins

Child sex predators don't hang out on Twitter, they become teachers. Macron should know this.

You really don't need to have a take on everything.

Fedi Instance but its just a bunch of bot-parody accounts of popular fedi accounts

meta 

i followed too many people the timeline is too fast

@lack the Buddha seemed to believe that the “self” is what experiences pleasure, pain, desire, fear… the self is what experiences self-ishness, psychologically and physically. And a computer will never experience that; it doesn’t enjoy a sense of accomplishment when it solves an equation. It doesn’t “crave” the electricity or bandwidth or experience physical hunger or emotional distress if it encounters RF interference blocking its signal.

@lack the mind should accept, with -like resignation, that we live in a Lawful Neutral universe that is sometimes indifferent to human well-being. Sometimes the hurricane wins. Sometimes the virus wins. Doesn’t conclusively dis-prove that Someone invented hydrogen and oxygen all those trillions of years ago.

@lack the mind should accept, with -like resignation, that we live in a Lawful Neutral universe that is sometimes indifferent to human well-being. Sometimes the hurricane wins. Sometimes the virus wins. Doesn’t conclusively dis-prove that Someone invented hydrogen and oxygen all those trillions of years ago.

@b_chocolatey I don't usually use the "problem of evil" argument, but when I do it's not me saying "I think God exists and is evil so I don't want it to exist", but more of a "If I temporarily assume that God exists for the sake of argument, I find this contradiction which suggests the initial idea (that a loving and powerful God exists) is incorrect".

I think this is a common misunderstanding of how the argument is supposed to work, made worse by atheists who maybe don't explain it well :)

@lack Atheist does the same thing. If the universe seems indifferent to human suffering, that proves conclusively that there is no creator deity behind the universe. The universe is not “good enough”.

@lack yes but Christianity already has a built-in explanation for the problem of evil - saying that it is our fault, not god’s. The Christian religion makes it a problem that we are not “good enough”.

@lack Christian god: “You are evil, and you deserve to die.” Atheist: “No, -you- are evil and I think you don’t exist.”

@lack I also think hard-atheist materialism, taken by itself without anti-Christian miso-theism, is a poorly thought out position. Either you accept the possibility of reincarnation or an afterlife of some sort, that just means you are re-inventing paganism… or, you deny the possibility of an afterlife or a soul, which is a difficult position to prove. Face it: consciousness is a hard problem, every AI developer or a sci-fi author knows that!

@me the remark about human insignificance, alluding to the Copernican principle, doesn’t disprove the existence of a personal god. Even Jesus said “are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? And yet not one of them falls to the ground without your father knowing about it” - suggesting that the Copernican implications had already been considered, and considered refuted, centuries before Copernicus.

@me more specifically, there is Beauty, and Order, And Truth (and all those other woo-woo expressions) both at the astronomical level - stars and supernovae - but also at the microscopic and quantum level - DNA, photons. The human mind and “soul” is not an insignificant afterthought in a supernovae universe.

@me the remark about human insignificance, alluding to the Copernican principle, doesn’t disprove the existence of a personal god. Even Jesus said “are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? And yet not one of them falls to the ground without your father knowing about it” - suggesting that the Copernican implications had already been considered, and considered refuted, centuries before Copernicus.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.