Show newer

Nature :
nature.com/articles/d41586-023
Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data sets.
Wide distribution of findings shows how analytical choices drive conclusions.

And of course, Mastodon represents the social medium to use if you care about open science; as the UNESCO points out, it's important that the infrastructure we as scientists use is community-owned and open, not corporation-owned and subject to the CEO's whims.

Since I use social media to discuss science, meet colleagues, network, and disseminate to the general audience and colleagues, I can't keep using X with integrity.

unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/

🧵4/5

I missed this #Elsevier pilot project with #OpenPeerReview in 2019.
nature.com/articles/s41467-018

"Publishing [#PeerReview] reports did not significantly compromise referees’ willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. Younger and non-academic scholars were more willing to…review & provided more positive & objective recommendations. Male referees tended to write more constructive reports…Only 8.1% of referees agreed to reveal their identity in the published report."

Update. New study: "Most journals [in #biology] offer minimal support for scientists whose first language is not English…Only 8% of the journals made their complete guidelines to authors available in at least one language other than English; less than 7% allowed authors to publish articles in languages other than English; and a mere 10% explicitly approved the use of references published in a language other than English."
nature.com/articles/d41586-023

#Multilingualism #MultilingualResearch

Show thread

A mental-health crisis is gripping science — toxic research culture is to blame
nature.com/articles/d41586-023

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.