Show newer

Printing to the left of me, milling to the right...

...here I am, stuck in the middle with earplugs.

So, here I am facing some stock with my Cubiko (later to be used as the case for a yarn counter I'm working on), I start the program, and an extremely stunned sawdust-covered housefly comes flapping out of the mechanism and drops to my desk.

I am no expert in housefly expressions, but I'm pretty sure that was "What in the name of Housefly Jaysus just happened!?"

This morning's moment of hilarity.

Also, note to self: dust shoe, not bug shoe.

When someone talks about their enthusiasm for political assassinations, it should be legal to say "well, I don't approve of them myself, but since you do...", pull out a gun, and stick it in their earhole.

Not to fire it, of course; we're not animals.

But watching the real-time opinion reversal would be a joy and a grand amusement.

Juffo-Wup fills my fibers and I grow turgid.

The Gay Mer-Gate, a secret portal to a magical land populated by queer fish-people.

@aphyr (That is, the necessary accountability and impossibility of challenging a conviction is the first argument; the second argument is basically the same but focuses on how this protects actual perpetrators by making all witnesses who might come forward equally guilty as the perpetrators; the third is that it means that there is no need to 'frame' someone for the crime, a police officer can simply carry offending material with them when they break in to your house and that makes you guilty)

@aphyr The first classic argument against strict liability laws for possession or viewing is that they make enforcement completely unaccountable, as possession or viewing of evidence is a crime, and even pointing at the thing or giving a complete enough set of directions to find the thing might be a crime, so the only people who can accuse people of the crime without being found criminally liable are those who laws mysteriously never seem to be applied against (eg the Met Police in the UK).

"And someone tell that guy that a collection of false beards and a willingness to incite punch-ups among his followers does NOT make him three distinct gods!"

Show thread

Monopolies Commission but for monotheisms.

“I’m sorry, but to maintain a competitive theology, I have an order here requiring you to break up into at least four smaller gods.”

How is plural formed?

(plz. boost)

I have seen people, in these current days of multiple atrocities, calling upon we merry writers of fiction to say something relevant.

Well, here it is:

Consider the public responses to events in these times as today’s sad and sorry reminder exactly how many of us would be red-flagged by the Guardians of Our Harmony as unfit for participation in a society of sane and reasonable people.

Today I find myself needing to pull data off a DVD, only to discover that quietly, without noticing, I have ended up without a single optical drive in the house.

Hard drives, SSDs, every type of SD card made, even floppies, those I have things tucked away to read should them unexpectedly turn up. Optical disks, though, nothing.

It’s a lovely morning in Sunnydale, and you are a horrible geas.

If it doesn't involve Special Circumstances, or at least Contact, I don't want to hear about your Culture war.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.