Show newer
Josh Peek boosted

When I wrote my first research proposal, I was given one to emulate. How about we give that advantage to everyone? This story includes a link to our $190M NASA Earth Venture Mission Proposal: Butterfly
link.medium.com/1SOV42Cl6hb
#OpenScience #openaccess
@openscapes

Scientists with active research programs I have a question for you. I am starting sabbatical in February and I’d like to spend some time organizing my research. What are your favorite tricks, large and small, for being effective in research?

Josh Peek boosted

"Persons who received the BA.5-containing bivalent booster had better neutralizing activity against all Omicron subvariants (especially against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB) than those who received 1 or 2 monovalent [original] boosters"
nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM

Josh Peek boosted
Josh Peek boosted

Do you have questions about the new scientific information policy for the NASA science mission directorate?
We have answers on our frequently asked questions including those on open access, scientifically useful, exclusive use periods, software, variances, and much more!
science.nasa.gov/researchers/s
See the address on the page to email us if you have questions that are not answered there or ask me here!
#nasa #OpenScience #astrodon #EarthData

Josh Peek boosted

There was a young man
From Cork who got limericks
And haikus confused

a Mastodon challenge for anyone who sees this post: post something every day that a) is cool/interesting b) not about billionaires c) not about social media.

People, I have done the unthinkably American and spent my bonus on a very large TV. Wish me luck.

Josh Peek boosted

Many of the journalists Elon suspended today on Twitter are here on #Mastodon. Please follow and boost:

Drew Harwell, Washington Post
@drewharwell

Donie O’Sullivan, CNN
@donieosullivan

Steve Herman, VOA
@w7voa

Micah Lee, Intercept
@micahflee

Tony Webster
@tony

Matt Binder, Mashable
@MattBinder

#freepress #journalism #journalists #news

NIF does not so sustainable energy research. They are a weapons lab. That’s it.

Pretty excited that we can now see really crisp images from the laser holograms of 3D molecular clouds we’ve been brining to life over the last 5 years or so. Mad props to Linnea Rundgren, Catherine Zucker, ans Hannah Bish who have been working on this with me. Hit the link for a video. share.icloud.com/photos/0aapaM

Josh Peek boosted

Jobs posting! @spacetelescope isn't just astronomers and engineers! Currently hiring a Collection Management Librarian, Processing Archivist, grants admin, business resource staff (plus astronomers, software engineers). Hybrid office in #Baltimore, some jobs remote from surrounding states. Come work with me!

Job Board is always:
recruiting2.ultipro.com/SPA100

I just completed 3 years of service on the Dunlap Institute Advisory Committee. DI is Canada’s premier astronomical instrumentation institute and they are a big part of the wildly scientifically productive CHIME among many other instruments. It is also a place that cares deeply about people, and has shown time and again that supporting great science requires great support for people.

Josh Peek boosted

RT @johannateske@twitter.com

"At the request of both the STUC & JSTUC, the STScI is soliciting the community's interests & concerns related to data access policies." I know many people feel strongly about this important topic, so here's the place to formally express your thoughts! docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI

🐦🔗: twitter.com/johannateske/statu

Community Survey on Data Access Policies for Hubble and JWST

At the request of both the Hubble Space Telescope Users Committee (STUC) and the JWST Users Committee (JSTUC), the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) is soliciting the community's interests and concerns related to data access policies. Context: NASA, and US science as a whole, are moving toward a more open-access stance. In August 2022, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) updated U.S. policy guidance to make the results of taxpayer-supported research immediately available to the American public at no cost, with the expectation that all agencies, including NASA, will have updated their public access policies fully implemented by the end of 2025. This change in US national policy comes shortly after recent changes in NASA's Science Information Policy (SPD-41) which now states, “There shall be no period of exclusive access to Mission data. A period after the data have been obtained may be allowed for activities such as calibration and validation of the data. This period shall be as short as practical and shall not exceed six months.” In general, the Exclusive Access Period discussion in SPD-41 refers to future missions, and there is currently no request from NASA to change data access policies for Hubble or JWST. This community survey has been recommended by our Users Committees, in keeping with good practice of continual assessment of mission policies and their impact on science return and mission inclusivity. Please see https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/science-data/science-information-policy and https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2022/08/25/breakthroughs-for-alldelivering-equitable-access-to-americas-research/ for further information on these policy updates. Current status: Historically, Hubble and JWST science policy regarding exclusive data access has been a balancing act between both the needs of and the benefits to the full community. For Hubble, since Cycle 21 (starting 2013), Large (currently defined as ≥ 75 orbits) have had a default of zero exclusive access period; the data from Treasury programs have been immediately publicly available since Treasury programs were introduced in 2001 (Cycle 11). Since Cycle 25 (starting 2017), the default exclusive access period (EAP) has been six months for Small (≤ 34 orbits) and Medium (35 - 74 orbits) programs, down from 12 months previously. Midcycle programs have always had a default of three months EAP. All data taken with Director's Discretionary Time (DDT) is immediately publicly available. These policies will remain in place for the upcoming Cycle 31. For JWST, all GTO (Guaranteed Time Observer), Small (≤ 25 hours), and Medium (26 - 75 hours) programs in Cycles 1 and 2 have a default exclusive access period of 12 months. Large programs (≥ 76 hours) have default of zero EAP. As with Hubble, all data taken with Director's Discretionary Time (DDT) has no exclusive access period, including all data from the Director's Discretionary Early Release Science (DD-ERS) programs. For both Hubble and JWST, the Exclusive Access Period is given per dataset, not per program. A "dataset" is all of the data taken within a single visit (as defined in the Phase 2 file), and thus may not be all of the data a program takes for a given target. This means that if it takes 9 months to obtain the data for a full small or medium Hubble program, then the earlier data will already be public when the last data are taken. Full documentation for Hubble and JWST can be found at https://hst-docs.stsci.edu and https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/, respectively. Many of NASA's observatories (e.g., Swift, TESS) have no exclusive data access period. We note that all data taken with the upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will immediately be open access, i.e., have no exclusive access period. This survey: This survey consists of five sections: 1. demographic information to ensure voices from across the astronomical community are represented and heard, 2. past experience with accessing or analyzing data either with or without exclusive access periods, 3. anticipated possible impacts of eliminating the exclusive access period for Hubble and/or JWST data, 4. possible implementation strategies for handling requests for exclusive access if Hubble and/or JWST move to a default of zero exclusive data access, and 5. space for open-ended feedback on the broad topic of open access to Hubble and JWST data. We expect sections 1-4 to take approximately 10-15 minutes to complete. This survey will be open until Wednesday, February 15, 2023. Please share it!

docs.google.com
Josh Peek boosted

social media meta 

The sudden explosion of interest in Hive does not, I think, indicate that it's an op. More likely, people are dissatisfied with the available options post-twitter (yes, including mastodon), and are hungry for something that might be better. And people understand network effects, so they are inclined to hype things up as much as possible.

I don't think a startup can do it. To my mind there is one company who could announce a product that would end the uncertainty overnight. They already have a huge userbase. They already have the infrastructure to support massively-connected message graphs. They already have a lot of experience with moderation and balancing the needs of communities and governments and corporate ad-buying departments. That company is Reddit.

If Reddit announced a new user-specific UX with twitterish feeds tomorrow, they would start off with more users than Twitter ever had. With opt-in integration between the new feed and existing reddit subscriptions, the ramp-up time would be essentially nil.

Personally, I don't want that to happen. I'd prefer to see Mastodon grow and evolve and firmly establish Open Source as the best way to implement social media. But Reddit is the dark horse I'm watching out for, and they'd be crazy not to be working on it.

Xkcd.com/2701 is the secret to my success

Ok Mastodon, here is a first view of holograms I am making of nearby starforming molecular clouds in 3D. $ from NSF, help from Catherine Zucker, Linnea Rundgren, Hannah Bish, and JHU

Josh Peek boosted

Moon ahead! The #Orion and its target as seen from one of the many GoPro cameras on the solar cells: flickr.com/photos/nasaorion/52

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.