I wonder if it supports fenced code blocks?
```javascript
for (let x of items) process(item, 'now')
```
Hmm, some of those worked, but not the bulleted list or the blockquote, so I guess this isn't really Markdown or close to it.
Oh neat, Markdown support is new since I last used Mastodon! Maybe I can use *italics* and horizontal separators
------
and bulleted lists:
* Italics
* Bulleted lists
* Links
* Headers
* Blockquote
* Preformatted text
A link should be like [hafnium oxide](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_oxide):
> It is an electrical insulator with a band gap of 5.3~5.7 eV.
And preformatted text should be like
x = 1:10
@Ninjatrappeur that's very impressive, I've never seen a compiler that could do constant folding through mutation like that before
@w84death congratulations!
I have just published the @nlnetlabs perspective on the @EU_Commission #CyberResilienceAct proposal vs #OpenSource:
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/open-source-software-vs-the-cyber-resilience-act/
We feel the current proposal misses a major opportunity. The CRA could bring support to #OpenSource devs maintaining the critical foundations of our digital society. But instead of introducing incentives for integrators or financial support, the current proposal will overload small developers with compliance work.
Talk to me. Spread the word. Read the CRA
I'm getting nice pretty Computer Modern glyphs, including \mathbb, but there's like a giant superscript that screws up the layout for my whole post. Do other people see the same thing?
Hmm, and a little broken even on the toot view.
\(\exists w, x, y, z \in \mathbb Z^4: w^4 + x^4 + y^4 = z^4\)
Hmm, seems like we do have Mathjax but it's maybe a little broken on the public timeline.
I read a lot. Sometimes I learn things. I like making things. I think reading and doing are complementary.