Show newer

updated from pages 53 to 58 it's clear in the construction that for the case of leptons, for example, righthanded leptons don't interact with the W^+- vector gauge bosons only their lefthanded counterparts and this is so since righthanded leptons have zero isospin however, seeing this would wait for the next updates in which we construct the covariant derivative terms for righthanded fermion singlets
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

(additional resource material re G -- measuring G during the big bang nucleosynthesis and comparing it to its present value, results at 2sigma)
------
When combining the measured abundances and the baryon density from CMB observations by Planck, we find G_BBN/G_0 = 0.99^+0.06_−0.05 at 2σ confidence level.
arxiv.org/abs/1910.10730

Improved BBN Constraints on the Variation of the Gravitational Constant

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) is very sensitive to the cosmological expansion rate. If the gravitational constant $G$ took a different value during the nucleosynthesis epoch than today, the primordial abundances of light elements would be affected. In this work, we improve the bounds on this variation using recent determinations of the primordial element abundances, updated nuclear and weak reaction rates and observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). When combining the measured abundances and the baryon density from CMB observations by Planck, we find $G_\mathrm{BBN}/G_0 = 0.99^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ at $2σ$ confidence level. If the variation of $G$ is linear in time, we find $\dot{G}/G_0 = 0.7^{+3.8}_{-4.3}\times 10^{-12} \, \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, again at $2σ$. These bounds are significantly stronger than those from previous primordial nucleosynthesis studies, and are comparable and complementary to CMB, stellar, solar system, lunar laser ranging, pulsar timing and gravitational wave constraints.

arxiv.org
Show thread

preparing outlines for a draft on refresher analysis of inductor-capacitor filter LCF with full wave rectified voltage source

i can say (with full confidence) that more than 60% of my acquired knowledge in QFT i learned from the late Prof. Pierre van Baal especially on qft perturbative calculations see pp. 51 - 56
library.oapen.org/viewer/web/v

Show thread

last update july 2022: there are two basic loops here arising with (22.16.6) for the 288 identical terms, while (22.16.11) for the other 432 identical terms such loops depicted in fig.2, fig.3 respectively
drive.google.com/file/d/1QHrsn

in this: the equation of motion for the conformal scalar field does not solve for a particular form of this scalar, instead this equation of motion yields an identity equation... otoh, this conformal scalar is a functional of an auxiliary scalar field which itself does not have a specific form that is the only acceptable, not just one form can satisfy the identity equation
foxtrotpaparomeo.wordpress.com

Show thread

W^+ boson decays into an outgoing lefthanded top quark and outgoing lefthanded anti-bottom quark, seeing such interaction in the split up of involved fermions into + & - energy modes

Show thread

terms that contain interactions of w^+- vector gauge bosons with members of lepton family. fermions involved expanded into + and - energy modes from such we get, for example, the term for the decay of w^+ vector bosons into an outgoing neutrino and outgoing positron, the anti-particle of electron

Show thread

in this (1+1)-dimensionally reduced form of GR, the form of the conformal field is handed down by an auxiliary field not from the equation of motion for the conformal field. this auxiliary field is put in by hand and the acceptable form must satisfy a constraint resulting from the equation of motion for the conformal field.

Show thread

in the static setting, it's straightforward to establish correspondence to Schwarzschild solution yet, there is also the temptation to consider a setting where the fields evolve with both lower dimensional coordinates

Show thread

the forcing function is a full wave rectified voltage, we want to obtain for the forced response, which is the current i(t) but we have to perform first fourier analysis on the forcing function to get its fourier series

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.