De Groene Cup

What #PeriodProducts Are Best for the #Environment?

"#MenstrualCups are a really clear winner,” said Pippa Notten, a sustainability consultant who analyzed the environmental impact of menstrual products for the United Nations Environmental Program.

nytimes.com/2024/12/30/climate

#MenstrualHygieneManagement #Menstruation #EcologicalFootprint

Mark Burton

@JProl
It looked good (I just dumped #DuckDuckGo for #Qwant) but then I saw the bit about "#AI" / #MachineLearning - so it won't be an alternative at all, certainly not for search quality and #EcologicalFootprint

Nov 12, 2024, 09:13 · · · 0 · 0
Earthworm

Dear academics in this thread:

This 'flying scientist worried about emissions' dilemma is to me a perfect case where we could move away from guilt-driven individual action aiming to reduce our carbon footprint to become aware of our handprint to achieve collective/administrative changes [1].

We organize the conferences, we have access to the administrations that pay our travel costs and we know the community.

There are definitely alternatives:

"A straightforward way of cutting emissions therefore could just be reducing the number of meetings, e.g. organizing recurring annual meetings only every other year. This could also have other benefits such as more available time for research, teaching, or mentoring. In addition, it would impose less pressure to be away from home for the sake of visibility for researchers with families, which is a phenomenon that female scientists encounter more often than their male colleagues.

As humans, we find it easiest to network in person, but by solely relying on in-person meetings, certain groups of people can be excluded from the global science community. In order to allow for both an in-person experience as well as accessibility, an approach could be a hybrid format in which the visibility and networking opportunities for online attendants are prioritized. For large meetings, a hub format including virtual participation could be considered." [2]

We can do this! The benefits regarding inclusion, decolonization and, of course, emission reduction would be impressive.
:anarchoheart3:

‐---------
Further info:

A comprehensive toolbox to achieve flight reduction in academic institutions:
nature.com/articles/s44168-023

List of specific measures:
ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/assoc

[1] Here's the concept of the handprint:
kolektiva.social/@earthworm/11

[2] i love this article: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/art

@jatkinson1000 @steve @Ruth_Mottram

#EcologicalHandprint #CarbonFootprint #EcologicalFootprint #AcademicChatter

Earthworm

@MaQuest

Thanks, now I do too. We have work to do.

I was thinking if it makes sense to try to set up one of these brandnew newsmast channels about #degrowth.

(mastodon.online/@mastodonmigra)

And I am currently working on the preparation of a workshop about the concept of the #EcologicalHandprint: in opposition to the depressing concept of individualistic, guilt-loaded #EcologicalFootprint, the handprint is a concept to make people aware which topics they want to work on and where they have access to groups to spread the ideas and build community. I'll keep you updated how it went and maybe we can elaborate further.

We can do this!

thanks, @pvonhellermannn :ecoanarchism_heart:

Mastodon Migration (@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online)

OK, this is truly wonderful! Customized feeds for dozens…

mastodon.online
AnthropoceneMan

Although I wholeheartedly believe in the conclusion of this study…that the impacts of mankind began shortly after the end of the last ice age…the lack of a clear demarcation/ stratigraphic marker used (a preponderance of evidence approach) will likely not pass the IUGS/ISC criteria for defining the #Anthropocene

#AnthropoScenes #Anthropocene #AgeOfMan #EcologicalFootprint
#GeoHistory #Geology #Stratigraphy

🌎⚒️🪨⛏️🌋🌊📚

phys.org/news/2023-10-analysis

Analysis supports demarcation of new epoch characterized by human impact on planet

Scientists have long debated the Anthropocene Epoch,…

phys.org
Jack of all trades

"""
The most technologically advanced nations are the most energy- and material-intensive and have the largest per-capita ecological footprints. Hence, the consumer lifestyles of their average citizens (and of the wealthy residents of the developing world) are the least ecologically sustainable on Earth, and cannot be safely extended to humans everywhere.
"""
-- William E. Rees

nature.com/articles/420267b

#EcologicalFootprint #sustainability

Karthik Srinivasan

The above point is not to glorify South Asia and Africa as some paragons of good sustainable societies. It's to show how lopsided a world we have created and continue to perpetuate. It's to show that it is these "poorer" people that subsidize our wonderful and enlightened lives, and not the other way around. “We” (the death cult) are not yet dead because they suffer and have kept all of humanity alive. Yet, “we” treat them with utter contempt as undeveloped, uncivilized “third-worlders” who offer nothing to the world.

Significant improvements in their lives by increasing their biocapacity (which will happen irrespective of whether we aid or thwart them), while the richer nations re-negotiate a much more appropriate living with far less consumption and within "human" means (which given my realism-termed-as-pessimism is highly unlikely to happen), will go a long long way. It increasingly looks like the only way to live on this planet.

If we (richer nations) want to live in a just world, a world that will continue to feed us into the future as well, i.e., the rest of the world, which also happens to be the caretaker and custodian of our immense biodiversity; then changing our so called time and tested "free" ways of living is the least we can do.

They have done a lot, are we ready to do the bare minimum?

5/5

#ClimateOvershootDays #GlobalWarming #Inequality #EcologicalFootprint #EcologicalCatastrophes #PoliticalEconomy #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth #Europe #US #SouthAsia #Africa #Justice

Karthik Srinivasan

What’s interesting is, if August 2nd in 2023 is the global overshoot day, then by definition, the world should collapse tomorrow? So why is it not collapsing tomorrow?

Did anyone notice, for example, the conspicuous absence of all of South Asia with 25% (~2 billion people) of the world population in calculating the overshoot chart or data?. These include India (which gets blamed as the 3rd largest emitter blah blah), Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka.

Why? We couldn't collect data? Those countries and their institutions are unwilling and manipulating their footprint? NO.

It's because they live way below the global biocapacity. The overshoot calculation is of countries only exceeding global biocapacity.

Only if you include the very tiny nation of Bhutan (population ~0.78million), does the average (1.51) come anywhere near 1.6 for South Asia.

The same applies if you add another billion people from Africa who are absent in that chart as well. Only a small smattering of African nations like Libya (which pumps out oil for “us”) even go above 1.6.

4/5

#ClimateOvershootDays #GlobalWarming #Inequality #EcologicalFootprint #EcologicalCatastrophes #PoliticalEconomy #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth #Europe #US #SouthAsia #Africa #Justice

Karthik Srinivasan

We can't even seem to live well on the only inhabitable planet we have known, yet our masters, their sycophants, idiot savants, and nerds think we will techno-fix our way out of this (human ingenuity you know).

Better solution, settle on other planets.

Even better, suggest population controls elsewhere (starting from Malthus to Ehrlich to their neo-acolytes) so that we can continue our lives-as-usual. If only the world had a billion or so people, all Europeans and North Americans, imagine how wonderful it would be? Those damned fools in those damned hot and humid places spoiling it for all of us.

3/5

#ClimateOvershootDays #GlobalWarming #Inequality #EcologicalFootprint #EcologicalCatastrophes #PoliticalEconomy #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth #Europe #US #SouthAsia #Africa #Justice

Karthik Srinivasan

If everyone on the planet lives like Americans, Canadians, and Australians (~ 5.5% of world population), we would require at least 5 earths. If life on earth were a year, by March 23rd we would have overshot and destroyed the earth.

Europeans (and a few oil rich middle eastern nations) are not far behind, the earth would be destroyed by the end of May. You know, they are a far more sophisticated and cultured peoples unlike these Americans, we would only require 3 earths to sustain the “most ecologically conscious” European lifestyle.

All we see in these societies is whining, that everything has to be done by the big guys, policy paralysis, fossil fuel companies, corporate greed etc., etc., (all true), but without any level of reflection as to how a vast majority of everyday Americans (Canadians, Australians, and Europeans) perpetrate a gross and unjust world with their seemingly innocent everyday lives. There is a long laundry list of all those “seemingly innocent things” that make up our everyday lives. It’s not always top-down, we can try to change our patterns of living to change the patterns at the top too. But who wants to try, let’s point our fingers elsewhere.

2/5

#ClimateOvershootDays #GlobalWarming #Inequality #EcologicalFootprint #EcologicalCatastrophes #PoliticalEconomy #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth #Europe #US #SouthAsia #Africa #Justice

Karthik Srinivasan

There are many posts today about Climate Overshoot Days. August 2nd, today, is the global day for 2023 when the earth's ecosystem's ability to renew/recover itself has been overshot by "our'' consumption and destruction of it.

Think of it like the Doomsday Clock that the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists used to show how close we are to destroying the world with nuclear weapons. The double whammy of nuclear annihilation and global warming (ech boiling) looms.

How is this climate overshoot day calculated?
Climate overshoot days is estimated by multiplying the number of days in a year (365) with the ecological footprint of a nation (measured per capita as global hectares) divided by the “global biocapacity” of 1.6 global hectares (Gha) per person. This global biocapacity limit, defined as of 2018, ensures we are living "sustainably", i.e., like decent human beings ought to. If the ecological footprint is greater than the global capacity, the number we get is the number of overshoot days in a year.

Find below a summary chart of climate overshoot days.

It is a fun way to show how significant a threat “we” pose (so that the more educated and enlightened societies will ponder about it?). It’s noble, and concerned, but I don't see what actions it prompts. Maybe, I should try to cultivate optimism.

In the meanwhile, here are some facts/observations/omissions evident from that chart.

1/5

#ClimateOvershootDays #GlobalWarming #Inequality #EcologicalFootprint #EcologicalCatastrophes #PoliticalEconomy #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth #Europe #US #SouthAsia #Africa #Justice

Revista Entorno

Por horrible que parezca, la pandemia del COVID-19 es un mero síntoma de una muy grave disfunción ecológica y humana. La implosión económica prevista se encuentra directamente relacionada. La realidad global es que la sociedad humana alcanzó un estado de sobrecarga.

#HuellaEcológica
#EcologicalFootprint
#ecology
#decrecimiento
#degrowth
#Chile
#Latinoamerica
#world

revistaentorno.cl/entorno/rees

William Rees: El planeta nos obliga a cuestionar nuestra sociedad del crecimiento

Estamos utilizando los recursos naturales y sus servicios…

Revista Entorno
Anne Camozzi

What actions are you taking to encourage #action for the #climateemergency #climate #climatechange ? Apart from always trying to reduce my own impact, I’m using my skills in #EnvironmentalEducation to write in local newsletters and educate my grandchildren. We all have a role to play in #climatejustice . Have you examined your own #EcologicalFootprint ?
My 📸

Mx. Alex

My personal Earth Overshoot Day is July 7th. If everyone lived like me, we would need 1.9 Earths.

footprintcalculator.org

Not too bad (less than the average in Europe) but still impossible to maintain in the long run.

I'm gonna assume my geekery (buying gadgets) and shopping a lot of non-locally sourced products are not helping and I should definitely do better on that front.

Invest in better energy efficiency for my home would also be pretty good.

#EcologicalFootprint