These are public posts tagged with #fortran. You can interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
So now one of the reasons for GNU #FORTRAN is gone:
Keep hearing whispering voices "GNU COBOL, GNU COBOL"
@mattgemmell Surely you mean 64x16.
Yes, that is Fortran. On the Radio Shack TRS-80. My first programming job.
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original…
www.youtube.comPorting COBOL Code and the Trouble With Ditching Domain Specific Languages - Whenever the topic is raised in popular media about porting a codebase written in ... - https://hackaday.com/2025/04/16/porting-cobol-code-and-the-trouble-with-ditching-domain-specific-languages/ #softwaredevelopment #featured #interest #gnucobol #fortran #cobol
Was für eine Freude. Mal wieder alten #fortran Code debuggen.
Does anyone know a specific version of fortran or algol that does not have "for" as a reserved word, so it can be used as a variable or something, I need it for an exam. #programming #fortran #algol
I would be a greybeard #UNIX guy if I could grow a non-scraggley beard, and it's unfair to the #DOGE teens to claim that the IRS and Social Security rely on ancient #COBOL code that only a few people alive actually understand. They also rely on ancient #FORTRAN code and even I never studied that at Computer Camp.
Pondering if I dare to put #Fortran into my CV.
I can do some Fortran, partly because it keeps coming up in all sorts of #retrocomputing contexts, but, even with Ratfor enhancements, I don't consider it a well-designed or pleasant language, and I'm not sure I can see myself working at a place that deals in new Fortran code now that nice, human-friendly languages such as NumPy and APL have been invented. Besides, 21st century Fortran is a really weird language that doesn't even know what it wants to be when it grows up.
The original #LISP had 7 primitives: \(\texttt{cons}\), \(\texttt{car,}\) \(\texttt{cdr}\), \(\texttt{atom}\), \(\texttt{quote}\), \(\texttt{eq}\), and \(\texttt{cond}\). And the original #Smalltalk syntax could fit on a 5×7 card. That meant a novice could learn the syntax in a matter of minutes, and direct all his efforts to learning how properly to wield the power of that Turing-complete language. This was why, in the 1970s and the 1980s, many college freshmen were taught FP in Scheme (a more modern LISP) and many middle school children were taught OO in Smalltalk. These were surely the best "first" #programming languages.
#FORTRAN and #BASIC were simple, too. FORTRAN, the first high-level language, has been in continuous use since the late 1950s by engineers, who are not keyboard warriors. BASIC was invented in the early 1960s for teaching programming to non-STEM students at Dartmouth. It sired a whole generation of self-taught children in the 1980s.
Compare those to C++, Erlang, Python, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Scala, Rust, Kotlin, and pretty much every language in popular use today. Most consider Python and JavaScript to be the simplest of modern languages. Yet, they are massive, complex languages. No 10-year-old could teach himself those, nor should he.
The original versions of those classic languages cannot be used to solve modern problems. But they should still be taught to youngsters as their first language. Throwing in the kids' faces a modern enterprise language confuses them and discourages them. Consequently, many novices never attain that state of flow, when the joy of programming gushes forth.
#Simplicity is a virtue. Self-motivated learning is virtuous.
@b4ux1t3 #Crystal is not very popular, but worth a shot. Some people could point at #Nim as well. There was a time #Kotlin could be natively statically compiled, but I don't think JetBrains maintains this.
From the museum you could try #Ada or #Fortran - modern one is supposedly very nice language (I haven't tried).
I predicted¹ in 2014 that #julialang might replace #Fortran for #science and #engineering calculations. I think this process has begun and will continue.
Get a solid foundation in Julia (or any) language by starting with a good book:
Writing a commandline tool in #Fortran:
https://www.draketo.de/english/free-software/fortran
In case you want to broaden your #programming skills. Fortran seems to be making a comeback (currently 11 in the Tiobe index: https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/fortran/ ).
This is from 2017, written at the end of my Physics PostDoc where I used quite a bit of Fortran and learned to appreciate it much more than I expected.
Mo, 04/10/2017 - 22:37 — Draketo Here I want to show…
www.draketo.deFORTRAN package manager in Guix?
https://github.com/fortran-lang/fpm
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79357849/how-to-package-the-fortran-package-manager-for-gnu-guix
It's backed by https://www.sovereign.tech/tech/fortran
Fortran Package Manager (fpm). Contribute to fortran-lang/fpm…
GitHub