#osai

The European Open Source AI Index #OSAI now rates the openness of #DeepSeek R1 and #DeepSeek V3.

Jan 29, 2025, 09:59 · · 0 · 0

Maria Chiara Pievatolo @mcp@poliversity.it

#SALAMI #AI #OSAI Automated statistics applications without public (training) data are very similar to the philosopher's stone, which was, if anything, the result of secret (and "corporate" :-)) research. Bruce Schneier has a point, here .

AI Industry is Trying to Subvert the Definition of "Open Source AI" - Schneier on Security

The Open Source Initiative has published (news article…

Schneier on Security

Nov 16, 2024, 13:50 · · 1 · 0

Tommaso Gagliardoni @tomgag@infosec.exchange

I am confused by the new Open Source AI definition not requiring sharing the training data.

From the official FAQ of the OSI: "This approach would relegate Open Source AI to a niche of AI trainable only on open data [...] That niche would be tiny [...]"

I fail to see the problem here. Wasn't FOSS a small niche before GNU picked up steam?

(Also, if I'm not mistaken, the word should be "trained", not "trainable". A tiny but important difference)

Can someone enlighten me on how this is a sensible idea please? I am open to different opinions on the matter.

#AI #FOSS #OSAI #opensource #GNU #OSI

Nov 03, 2024, 23:07 · · 2 · 0

Shamar @Shamar@qoto.org

TIL that a #BlackBox #AI can be defined as #OpenSource.

Granting the “freedom to fine tune” cannot be enough to qualify as Open Source AI just like granting the “freedom to configure” cannot be enough to qualify as Open Source Software.

Yet, for #OSI it's enough.

And you can't provide effective solutions to the problem they pretend to see into making training data available.

Or you will be silenced.

https://opensource.org/blog/copyright-law-makes-a-case-for-requiring-data-information-rather-than-open-datasets-for-open-source-ai

#OpenSourceAI #OpenWashing #OpenWashingAI
#OSS #OSAI #AIAct #BigTech #GAFAM