#arxiv

Dear #reviewer,

Complaining that I don't cite 2 (or more!) papers that, coincidentally , are authored by you is, 99% of the time, blatant (and stupid) self-promotion. And if one is an #arxiv paper from this year, well, that's just ludicrous.

I wish reviewing systems include some sanity checks / alarm triggers that force #PCChairs to double-check this unethical behaviours.

(another pet peeve of mine when it comes to reviews is New Ideas tracks rejecting papers because of insufficient validation. Honestly, I think every #conference should include a #track for real #new #ideas where any type of validation is explicitly #forbidden as argument).

Awesome ArXiv is a fantastic curated list of tools, libraries, datasets and resources for discovering, reading and working with papers from arXiv — the open-access repository for scientific research.

https://github.com/artnitolog/awesome-arxiv

#research #arXiv #AItools

#arXiv Observation of Coherent Ferrons https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22559 ferrons are equivalent to magnons but in ferroelectric materials. Generated by launching collective oscillations of the ferroelectric dipoles using a short laser pulse, coherent ferrons are identified.

#arXiv The 'Brazil-nut effect' in bidisperse particle laden flow on an incline https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24114 “well-separated fronts of two species of particles, of the same density but different sizes, behind a clear fluid front, at lower inclination angles and volume fractions. A triple shock structure in the system of conservations. At higher inclination angles and volume fractions the particles congregate at a high concentration at the leading front corresponding to a singular shock in the model. Excellent agreement between theory and experiments.”

#arXiv Can a Dark Inferno Melt Earth's Core? https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24070 “dark matter could accumulate inside the Earth and begin to annihilate, producing heat within the Earth's core. By modelling the flow of heat through the Earth's core by numerically solving the heat equation, new limits on dark matter annihilating in the Earth, points out important new effects that must be considered when studying planetary heating by dark matter. New dark matter observables that could be searched for in exoplanet populations.”

#arXiv Search for a new 17 MeV resonance via e⁺e⁻ annihilation with the PADME Experiment https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24797 “The most significant deviation is found for ≈16.90 MeV, with a global significance of approximately 2 standard deviations over the null hypothesis expectation. The PADME Experiment at the Frascati DAΦNE LINAC has searched for a hypothetical particle with mass around 17 MeV. It should be produced resonantly via e⁺e⁻ annihilation when approaches its mass, inducing an excess of events with a two-body final state over the background.”

#arXiv Alternative Derivations of Hawking Radiation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19691 including the tunneling, anomaly and Green's function methods. Focus on the gravitational and trace anomalies of the (1+1)-D effective theory and the analytical continuation of the complexified spacetime.

Preprint: Why #Academics Are Leaving Twitter for #Bluesky (via #arXiv) https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24801 @bsky.app #socialmedia

#arXiv #GoodbyeTo The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21476 "this update has resulted in a major upward shift of the total SM prediction. There is no tension between the SM and experiment at the current level of precision. The SM prediction now reads 116 592 033(62) × 10^−11 (530 ppb). When compared against the current experimental average, one finds a difference of 26(66) × 10^−11, which implies that there is no tension between the SM and experiment at the current level of precision."

This is an AI agent tool that uses 3 agent personas to analyze arxiv papers from 3 different aspects which are integrated in an AI article summary. I have not seen this innovation before in AI article summarization tools. For some reason the tool does not seem to work on summarizing very recent arxiv articles. The tool is discussed in the post below:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40653990

The tool itself is accessed at:
https://www.stack-ai.com/

#research #arxiv #AItools #summarization

#Gedanken: Wäre es in Anbetracht der aktuellen Weltlage nicht eventuell sinnvoll, #Wikipedia – ebenso wie diese anderen akademischen Archive – gegebenenfalls unter eine deutsche akademische Förderung zu nehmen? Wie hießen diese anderen Archive noch gleich? Das hatte ich letztens hier gelesen. Exzellenzfördergelder sind auch geflossen, da sollte doch irgendwie ein gemeinsamer Nenner zu finden sein. #wissenistmacht Macht nichts das die USA dies nicht erkennen.

Edit: Nachtrag #arxiv.org

#arXiv Breaking the Code: Multi-level Learning in the Eurovision Song Contest https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11555 “four participating countries have chosen to ignore the ‘lesson’ that English lyrics increase winning probability: France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain.”

#arXiv Mathematical Politics https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11540 “A pathological liar?
What if you have a president who is a pathological liar? Can mathematics uncover statistical signs of the behaviour of such a liar? The information-based approach is sufficiently versatile to answer.”

#arXiv Laser transfer and retrieval via nanophotonic supercontinuum process https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12316 “a novel scheme for optical metrology, based on massive four-wave-mixings underlying a nanophotonic supercontinuum process.”

#arXiv 2.7-octave supercontinuum generation spanning from ultraviolet to near-infrared in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12438 “from 330 nm to 2250 nm by pumping the waveguide with a 1550-nm femtosecond pulsed laser with 0.687 nJ.”

#arXiv Has the LHC ruled out supersymmetry? The answer is no! https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11251 interesting and well-motivated scenarios with light superpartners remain viable even in the simplest incarnation of SUSY, the MSSM. Discovery prospects at the LHC remain good.

#arXiv Light Black Holes from Light https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16202 by colliding approximately plane-wave pulses, with only a small fraction of the energy escaping the black hole as scattered light or electron-positron pairs. But it is implausible in our universe.

#arXiv Modeling the Monty Hall Decision Problem with Reaction Kinetics https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15824 Matlab codes in https://github.com/osteinbock/MontyHall

Invest in Open Infrastructure (#IOI, @investinopen) makes an important point in its new report:
https://investinopen.org/state-of-open-infrastructure-2025/sooi-foreword-2025/

"Imagine just a few of the major open infrastructures serving scholarship today: #arXiv, #PubMed, #DSpace, #OpenJournalSystems, or perhaps #CreativeCommons…Consider how many of these have been created on a cycle of grants and sustained on a combination of donations, membership fees, service hosting, and/or specialized development…Most scholars, teachers, and researchers…accept them as a given and depend on them…But these infrastructures are not, on the whole, sustainable businesses with robust fiscal models and diversified revenues. Many do not turn profits; most operate at steady losses that are absorbed by philanthropic and government funders and a variety of research institutions including labs, universities, and colleges. They operate on systems rife with technical debt, and they depend upon volunteer labour to cover much of their human costs from governance to editorial review to code development."

#OpenInfrastructure #ScholComm

#arXiv EP241021a: a months-duration X-ray transient with luminous optical and radio emission https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07665