I've alluded to the fact that I spent many years working on a nation-wide(US) water testing project once and that I don't own the results, they were never published, and I can't specifically give away those results that I don't own. All of this recent talk about PFAs in water is absolutely killing me. This new water testing is going to take place over the next three years, and it's important to note that it's *only* talking about a handful of chemicals.
I've found that particularly US-based people really think their water is great and vastly overestimate how great it is. It comes out of the tap, you drink it and you don't die of waterborne illnesses. Woohoo. Really, it's an accomplishment.
But until you spend time in a water testing lab you don't really begin to realize how much isn't tested for in that water you drink and bathe in. It's just not possible.
People would ask me all the time "How do I get my water tested for everything?" You can't. Think of the story recently about how many chemicals are in plastics, for instance. 16,000-ish and over 4,000 that are potentially hazardous. Basically zero of those are tested for in any way whatsoever. To get something tested, someone has to care enough that it's there in the first place. Then someone has to create testing procedures and standards. Then there has to be a market for that test.
Let's JUST talk about PFAs. You know how many there are? Ballpark is ~15,000 different PFAs. You know how many are tested in this new EPA program? 25.
Now that we've established that, just how likely is it that testing will find PFAs in YOUR water in the US?
https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/
Pretty likely.
While I can't really talk about what states are likely to find if they honestly look, what I do talk about, and have for probably 20 years now, is what I did when I realized what's really in your water. I put in a whole home filter outside of our home to filter out a lot of stuff for showering and hand washing. No one so much as cleans vegetables here unless the water comes from the reverse osmosis system in our kitchen. Drinking water, ice, pasta water, fruit and veggie washing water, etc all comes from that.
I'm very sensitive to the fact that not everyone can do all of that. It's a step in the right direction that the EPA is beginning to do something about this, but it's far later than it should be and doesn't go nearly far enough. All I can say is that you should demand better, and not just about PFAs, but all contaminants in your water supply.
And before anyone asks, yes, the spring water on the homestead is about as clean as you can find anymore. Under 10 TDS and no contaminants that I've found to date. Again, can't test for everything even if you wanted to and had a million dollars to throw at it. It was a major selling point on the property for us.
@BE ewww. Do you know if the water filters you attach to a kitchen faucet filter out all that? That's what I have.
NSF/ANSI 53 means it's certified to remove at least some PFA/PFOAs. The removal limit for certification varies based on location, but, that's the code you're looking for in a filter.
I'm seeing a counter top filter system with a rating NSF/ANSI 58, is the higher number more effective?
And a few weeks ago on our evening news was a report that boiling water removes PFAS, so the next day I boiled water before drinking it, but when I thought about it, it made no sense, so I stopped...
Do you know if sparkling water beverage cans are plastic lined?
(Sorry, I have a lot of questions, and am excited to see you posting on this topic...)
Don't be sorry! I love the questions.
NSF 58 is specifically about reverse osmosis systems. There's a handful of different NSF certifications for different types of water filtering.
https://d2evkimvhatqav.cloudfront.net/documents/water_58_insert.pdf
Think of it as a minimum requirement. Most systems that meet the standards, surpass it.
I can't think of any reason that boiling water would remove PFAs. That's wild. They're way too stable to break down in boiling water(thus, forever chemicals) and they're not alive, so they don't die like bacteria, for example.
But, boiling kind of brings up something that should probably be discussed and that's distilled water. Distilling water alone won't remove all of the PFAs, despite some bad info out there. Distillation separates things based on boiling points, and some PFAs(remember, there's 15,000+) have boiling points around 100C. If you have lab quality distilled water, maybe, but I wouldn't do it at home and expect pure water. Just an FYI at what they might have been getting at there.
The sparkling water question is fantastic, and off the top of my head I don't know! I know sodas and other acidic substances(think tomato sauce) have used various linings to protect the aluminum can, and often those have had toxic substances that leech into the food/drink. I don't know about sparkling water, though.
I absolutely hear you. Little bit at a time is all you can do. We removed all non-stick PFA stuff a long time ago. After that we went item by item removing plastics. It's a whole thing, but, you either consent to industrial pollution or you don't!
That makes sense about microplastics and I'd never seen it before. Thank you for sharing it!
We went all glass storage, too, a while back, and either cast iron or ceramic coated cookware. I always say, though, that someone CAN legally sneak one or more of the 15,000+ PFAs into your kitchen by claiming "PFOA free" or even "PFA free" and then using GenX or PTFE because of legal definitions. It's always a shell game with some of these companies.
Silicone is a perfect way to discuss something I like to bring up. You just don't know what you don't know when it comes to "stuff" in your products. When companies aren't required to say exactly what's in their products, they tend not to, and then how do you know what to look for?
I use silicone spatulas and a few storage containers. You have to trust the seller at this point of the game with them. They're often made with varying amounts of methylsiloxanes. The toxicity of which isn't well studied, but, I feel comfortable using the ones I have.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018318105
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884743/
Important to note, the second source mentions "In conclusion, it should be noted that the safety of application decreases with the decrease in silicone particle size" and that's why you might have heard that methylsilioxanes in car emissions are thought to be quite toxic.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03797
tldr; Silicone >>> Plastic > Non-stick overall to me.
@BE @FiddleSix i also recently switched to ceramic skillets. I use silicone spatulas since they don't damage the skillets but I've seen some silicone food storage things. I think I'm going to get some of those for hiking and stuff like that, i currently use plastic for those activities since I need something lightweight that can't shatter
I use silicone ones for hiking. Great use case. I also don't use the refrigerator ice maker, so I make blocks of ice each night to make iced tea with the next day in silicone storage containers.
@FiddleSix @BE it seems like a lot of outlets saw the study headline about boiling water but didn't bother to read it to find the part about having to filter it!
@FiddleSix @BE I just saw this cartoon that relates ...
https://mastodon.social/@jensorensen/112231730367033010
So true 😂 And you have to laugh, because otherwise....well, blame the companies that made those choices for you without your consent.
@BE @FiddleSix I read about that boiling water thing too and thought "what." But then I came across this article that explains a study about boiling water then filtering it. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/boiling-tap-water-could-help-remove-80-percent-of-its-microplastics-study-suggests-180983874/
I've started switching all my kitchen storage to glass or ceramic with the cloth/beeswax tops. What do you think of silicone storage containers?