Given that hundreds of thousands of papers have been published in the scientific literature over the last three years about COVID, I highly recommend you stop and think about why one that you may hear about on the news, or covered in CNN, may have gotten there.
It would be a good idea to actually read the paper, before sharing, if you're willing and able.
I see a lot of probably well meaning sharing of information just because a certain paper may gotten on CNN or NBC and they're not always conveying the best information(some papers are better than others) or sometimes what the paper itself was even trying to say in the first place.
Yes, I'm referring to a certain one that's all over today, but, what I wrote will never be wrong.
Pro tip:
This applies to H5N1, too. The fire hose of bad science right now is crazy and all of the same COVID grifters are latching on trying to use "the next pandemic" to support their views on COVID.
Lots of absolutely well meaning people in my timeline right now are sharing stuff from people they've spent the last 4 years saying were unreliable.
Likewise, lots of "here's who you should listen to" followed by stuff from people saying the opposite on both the COVID and H5N1 fronts right now.
Being the "first" to put something up, or mashing the boost button just because something supports what you believe isn't as helpful as taking the time to critically think about it first.
I know saying this is pointless against the volume of bad science, but, try to think about it anyway.
