(1 of 11) How does the brain change its mind? Please check out the first preprint from the Khan lab! The PhD work of the incredible Nick Cole. We find that mice can switch 'one-shot' between distinct cognitive rules, driven by prediction-error signals in the ACC.
https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.27.518096v1.full
Tootprint:
Animals need to hold abstract rules or plans in mind and switch between them when appropriate. Imagine you walk up to your supermarket but the automatic doors don't open. This brief moment is often enough to make you mentally switch to an alternative shopping plan, and walk away to the next shop.
What happened at the moment of the door not opening? You switched (very fast) between two abstracts plans. This switching is a key cognitive ability. What signals in the brain trigger this transition? Lots of amazing prior work shows that the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) is key
One suggestion is that the ACC compares a prediction (door should open) to observation (it didn't) and the mismatch makes you switch plans. This is challenging to test! An animal must demonstrably hold a rule in mind, and when the rule prediction is violated, it must switch the plan held in mind, but...
If an animal takes multiple trials to switch (usually the case) and shows intermediate behaviour for a few trials, its difficult to assign activity in the brain precisely to the cognitive rule switch. And subsequently its difficult to identify circuit mechanisms behind the mismatch computation.
Nick got mice to do something impressive: Blocks of highly accurate visual discrimination (Rule1) followed by highly accurate odour discrimination while ignoring the same visual stimuli (Rule2), and the block transition was triggered by just one experience of an expectation violation
(3 of 11) This is not just a surprise, like oddball tasks. This is a prediction mismatch which has demonstrable behavioural consequences - the mice switch behaviour using it. A complete switch in mental rules happens at a well defined moment - the mouse proves this to us by its behaviour
We recorded from the ACC, and aligned activity to the moment the odour was expected to arrive but didn't, and found neurons with a clear response - to the NON occurrence of an expected odour. Remember nothing happened at this moment - only the expectation violation.
(4 of 11) ~10% of all ACC neurons show this, a big number considering PFC responses. And we didn't see this signal by chance/movement artefacts, eg.identical recordings from V1 didn't show it. Also this signal is different based on where cells project to: mismatch signals are excluded from ACC neurons projecting to the striatum
(5 of 11) Crucially, the amplitude of this signal is larger when the NEXT trial is going to be a correct one-shot transition (compared to transitions where it makes 2 or 3 errors before switching). The mismatch amplitude matters to upcoming behaviour. An RL model showed cool similarities
(6 of 11) If the mismatch signal is so important to behaviour, is it broadcast across most of cortex? we used widefield calcium imaging to map it across the dorsal cortex, and found it to be beautifully restricted to frontal areas (above ACC/PFC). Similar to primates :)
(7 of 11) Coming back to the ACC, are these mismatch signals actually needed for switching behaviour? We silenced ACC: the mice showed a major deficit in switching, but perfect accuracy once switched, each time! Neighboring prelimbic didn't have any such effect. This is something to behold ...
(8 of 11) Anyone who's trained a mouse will know, if they don't get it right a few times they will do exploratory licks. Mice with ACC silenced ignore tens of trials of visual stimuli, rewarded if they would lick, but they are stuck in the odour block rule: ignore visual, wait for odour...
And once they do eventually switch, they do near-perfect performance the rest of the block, with ACC still silenced! We also did a fun single-trial Un-silencing experiment to nail this point. So ACC is truly a gate, allowing transitions between cognitive states (and PL is not)
Finally, what is the circuit for comparing prediction and reality? Amazing prior work (Keller lab) shows VIP & SOM interneurons are key. So we activated VIPs while measuring mismatch signals. All-optical method so we are sure the manipulation caused disinhibition as expected
(9 of 11) VIP activation almost abolished the mismatch signal! (Since the manipulation was only in the imaging site, not bilateral, this didn't affect behaviour). So VIP cells are key to generating the prediction error signal. This effect (riding on disinhibition by VIPs) constrains circuit models of mismatch
Image
(10 of 11) If you've made it this far, check out the paper which has some other cool findings, particularly context-switching RL models. Also, I have found that its easy to misunderstand this task, so please reach out if any doubts.
(11 of 11) This work was a great team effort, driven by Nick Cole
with tremendous contributions from Matt Harvey, Dylan Myers-Joseph and modelling of the behaviour by Aditya Gilra. Feedback welcome! Please RT
(2 of 11) When they expected an odour (rule2) which didn't arrive, they switched rules, and started responding based on rule 1, the very next trial, and stayed very accurate for the rest of the block, and did this over and over allowing us to zoom in on the rare moment of prediction mismatch!