@failedLyndonLaRouchite

Perhaps so.

I'm not a bioinformatics expert and don't claim to be. I'm actually very curious what any experts have to say about it.

10,000 negatives in a row strikes me as incredibly high for a test that's only required to have 98% negative agreement with other tests, and that's not even getting into real world issues of sample contamination related to the retrospective sampling technique used.

Either way, there's a larger body of contradictory evidence as I presented, and it was one point among many.