A reverse ontological argument for #atheism:
• It is possible that #God exists.
• If you grant that it's possible that God exists, you should also grant that it's possible that God does not exist.
• If it's possible that God does not exist, this means there is some possible world where God does not exist.
• To be considered a "necessary being", God must exist in all possible worlds, but we've just agreed there are some possible worlds where God does not exist.
• Thus God is not a necessary being, and if "necessary" is part of God's nature: God does not exist.
@b_chocolatey Sadly not my original idea, just my phrasing of the idea. Modal logic cuts both ways :)