So today I tried to track down this article in the Economist from Douglas Hofstadter.

economist.com/by-invitation/20

According to my reference librarian, it's unobtainable here at the University of Washington.

We have access, print and online, to all of the Economist from 1981, but not this piece — it's special "online only" content just for personal subscribers.

IMO this is unconscionable. I wonder if the author (a hero of mine since age 14) is aware they've wasted his time in this way.

@ct_bergstrom fwiw, I tried some of the examples of things that break ai that he gives in that article against chatgpt and it answered perfectly. I think Hofstadter’s argument there is already out of date

Follow

@admin @ct_bergstrom It's still possible to ask chatgpt questions that make it "babble randomly" - confidently and convincingly, but still fundamentally wrong.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.