Here's a first... I just got an email because ChatGPT suggested an article I wrote to somebody. Could I send them a copy? Except, I never wrote the article, it doesn't exist. PLEASE realize right now that this tool isn't pulling out cool references for you. It's making plausible titles and matching them to authors names.
Before you write your paper and submit it to arXiv, you should be aware that this has been reported over and over again. I myself have written on that some six weeks ago (you are welcome to cite that).
Such "Schrödinger Facts" are exactly expected from the way the generative models work, there is nothing nefarious or malicious involved, and once one understands why this happens, one can still make good use of the results.
https://sentientsyllabus.substack.com/p/chatgpts-achilles-heel
This invites us to pay more attention to fact checking. That's not a bad thing.
And no, books are just as readily confabulated in my experience.
🙂
#SentientSyllabus #ChatGPT #HigherEd #Education #SchroedingerFacts
Nice to meet you Elisa. It's always a pleasure to encounter colleagues who share my interests.
🙂
@boris_steipe @L_howes thank you for the advice and reference. I wasn't saying that I'll write a paper about how and why ChatGPT finds (or doesn't find) references, that was in confirmation of the orig comment. We were surprised about the books, which also isn't the focus of the project. The info we are gathering will be made available, for anyone interested and I highly doubt it will be replicating other people's work. I am a professor btw, done this before 😄