subtooting prestige neuroscience 

the latest in "if it's in Nature, you can be sure it's hogwash"

the abstract:

Our findings suggest that shared neural dynamics represent a fundamental and generalizable feature of interacting neural systems present in both biological and artificial agents and highlight the functional significance of shared neural dynamics in driving social interactions.

nature.com/articles/s41586-025

the press release:

"We've shown for the first time that the neural mechanisms driving social interaction are remarkably similar between biological brains and artificial intelligence systems. This suggests we've identified a fundamental principle of how any intelligent system—whether biological or artificial—processes social information."

uclahealth.org/news/release/st

the reality - movements that happen at the same time correlate with global changes in neural activity at the same time. gee whiz

we found that activities of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons explained the majority of behavioural features above chance, and most strongly represented the derivatives of body position (speed and acceleration) and posture features (distance between body and tail)

Follow

subtooting prestige neuroscience 

@jonny

We discussed the same paper in a journal club in the lab. We had similar thoughts: circular analyses and "carefully" constructed statistical comparisons. It was shocking to see that the source data provided was just averages.

Another thing to notice is that the peer review reports are missing, must have been a tough battle. The number of reviewers was probably higher than three.

re: subtooting prestige neuroscience 

@dimokaramanlis i'm gonna hit up pubpeer when they get back to me yes or no about the data request

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.