Many believe a significant way to address #climatechange is to 'eat local,’ but that’s not always true. The impact all depends on the kind of #food + how & where it’s produced.

Some foods require fewer resources (water, energy) in some parts of the world. Season can be important. Overall, transportation has a much lower carbon footprint than land use change. And so on.

So instead of ‘eat local,’ let’s go with ‘eat thoughtfully.’ ourworldindata.org/food-choice

@Sheril I'm certainly down with this in principle, but it sounds like a tremendous cognitive load when you think about a three course meal or, inordinately and brain-breakingly worse, for a party. Where are all the ingredients sourced from? What are the most climate-friendly options balanced against price, geography, another important climate consideration, dietary requirement/preference etc.

@JustinMac84 @Sheril Sure, it would be very hard to pick the optimal foods, but you could use a heuristic like "no animal products", or "no animal products or chocolate or coffee", and get almost all the way there, and maybe then it actually doesn't matter if we pick the verymost optimal foods that are left, because there's little to be gained by fine-tuning it more.

@emma_cogdev @JustinMac84 @Sheril and almonds. Over 12 liters of water for one single almond nut.

Follow

@Robru3142 @emma_cogdev @JustinMac84 @Sheril ah but see tree nuts there on the very bottom. Is that wrong?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.