@Rasta correct, and those in charge of the operation are legally obliged to maximise the profit for the shareholders, not deliver the service. Indeed, delivering a high quality service will not maximise the profit.

Public utilities and the caring professions cannot be run by private business as they are philosophically opposed.

Follow

@peterbrown @Rasta That isn't quite how fiduciary duty to shareholders works, legally. At least not in the US.😂

@ech @peterbrown @Rasta it's not how it works *on paper*. It's also not how it *should* work.

In practice however, that's exactly how it works in way too many corporations. Maximise short term shareholder benefits at the expense of customers, employees and, all too often, society. Execs all over love to wilfully misunderstand the term fiduciary duty'.

@ech @Rasta maybe a slight difference in emphasis “One of the board’s primary responsibilities is to ensure the financial benefit of their operations.”

board-room.org/blog/fiduciary-

@ech @Rasta regardless of the legal obligations, a director that was not taking into account the profitability of the business for the investors will be lucky to last as long as the next AGM. 😂

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.