True story: I was once invited on the board of directors of a feminist news outlet and I came to suspect that I wasnt there to be the "trans" voice but more to be the white voice against the black women. So I just shut up and voted with the black women. No one noticed me but it was my finest hour. For once in my life I managed to do good by being quiet. Shutting up is very hard for me, Im a chatterbox. But it can really pay off. I bet no one who was there remembers me at all. As Bilbo would say, thank goodness.
Sorry Twitter, I was deleting all my tweets and think I deleted a load-bearing one.
#TwitterDown
I keep seeing articles about Mastodon slumps, and journalists going back to Twitter. Is it fair to say, that maybe Mastodon isn't for journalists, or brands, or even people who want large accounts? Maybe Mastodon is true social media, for people who want to interact and discuss, not be influenced, sold to, or manipulated with cult style tactics and followings. There will always be groups who dislike the idea of the people controlling their own inputs, people who don't like the idea of accessible Administration, and people who don't like the idea that if we don't like a space that we can just move to another one, or even create our own. Individualism is scary to the kind of people who thrive on complacency, and not challenging the status quo.
It's hard to know how to help those suffering from the devastating #earthquake in #syria and #turkey. Many have their trusted charities. I worked in international public health in scores of countries over my thirty year career. From observing (and sometimes working with) various charities/humanitarian response outfits, my 'go to' charity is Medecins Sans Frontiers/ Doctors Without Borders. You can donate here: https://donate.doctorswithoutborders.org/secure/donate?_gl=1*4w99x2*_ga*MTAzOTI2MjQ3LjE2NzU3MDU2OTk.*_ga_C7EW6Q0J9K*MTY3NTcwNTY5OS4xLjAuMTY3NTcwNTY5OS4wLjAuMA..&_ga=2.42982757.1950086691.1675705701-103926247.1675705699
Turkey and Syria: more than 1,700 people confirmed dead after two large earthquakes strike – latest updates https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/feb/06/turkey-earthquake-2023-live-updates-quake-tremor-latest-news?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other #earthquake #syria #turkey
“The thing we understand, which is proven in international research, is that providing housing for homeless persons is always more cost-effective for society than keeping people homeless…We did a study that showed when a former homeless person gets housing, even with support, the cost savings for society are at least €15,000/person per year.”
Canadian city learning from Finland.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/london-wants-to-eradicate-homelessness-here-s-how-finland-is-doing-it-1.6728398
Genuinely have no idea how to turn the toxic cycle of discourse around.
Staying out of the way feels wrong.
Speaking up never seems to go well.
Trying to model less reactive behavior doesn’t seem to help anything.
Technology is turning all of us, myself included, into the most reactive versions of ourselves. We are not evolved to handle this much input.
I’m smart enough to know we need to step back from the brink, but not enough to know how to get there.
Humans don't act for reasons, we act and then produce reasons as required.
Paraphrasing Mercier and Sperber
Cunk on earth is an absurdly stupid, in an intellectually funny way, show.
If you're not already familiar, the "host" Philomena Cunk is a persona played by comedian Diane Morgan who interviews scholars like an ordinary documentary host but with very stupid questions.
The questions and narrations are stupid in a way like children asking things with logic half correct and half absurd.
And yet if you read between the lines, it's very clever.
Very British, I'd say.
I'm astonished by a medical treatment I had a few days ago.
On the 12th, I went to the local hospital's ER because I was having a lot of trouble getting enough oxygen into my blood. Prior to this breathing crisis, I could get by just fine with about 3 liters from my concentrator, but even maxing it out to 5 wouldn't get me much above 80 on the oximeter.
A quick Xray followed by a CT scan showed that I had pneumonia, which isn't a great thing to have when you also have cancer. The right lung was almost totally blocked by a tumor and thus couldn't drain fluids normally. The only solution for the problem was surgery, but my local medical system didn't have anyone who could do that sort of procedure, so my oncologist started working on finding someone who could do it. It turned out that there was such a surgeon in Phoenix, which is about two hours from where I live.
The local hospital kept me going with various respiratory treatments and a pretty serious IV antibiotic. Finally, on the 22nd, they put me in an ambulance for the ride down to the Phoenix hospital. The surgery was done in the afternoon of the next day.
Using microcameras and lasers, the surgeon was able to cut away the tumor, burn out the pneumonia, and create the needed fluid drainage channels. He'd originally intended to install a shunt but discovered he could avoid that by reshaping the tissues as they were. THE PROCEDURE TOOK 40 MINUTES. I mean, really? Less than an hour? I'm still in amazement over that. He must also work as a magician as a side job.
And the result? As long as I was in Phoenix, I needed zero supplemental oxygen. None at all. There was no pain anywhere, not even a sore throat. And I came home the next day.
Since I live at about 5400 feet in altitude, I do need some supplemental oxygen, but only about two thirds what I originally started out with.
Sure, cancer is kind of a bummer when viewed in a certain light, but I am in amazement at how lucky I am, over and over. It's brought me into contact with a lot of very interesting people with whom I enjoy discussing this and that. And every new day is another gift to unwrap and enjoy. Speaking of which, I had an eclair for breakfast. It was really, really good. See what I mean? 😎
Re the Supreme Court leak, the most plausible explanation for the report's findings is pretty obvious in retrospect:
They investigated everyone -- including a look at their digital communications -- who had access to the draft ruling EXCEPT the justices.
That's basically a roundabout way of saying the leaker had to have been one of the members of the court.
This is a coverup, not an investigation.
Retired SysAdmin living in the high country of Arizona, USA. I enjoy learning about physics, cosmology, genetics, neurology, and suchlike. Deeply confused by worldwide trends towards authoritarianism. I thought we'd already learned about that stuff. But I guess not.