@carlos @BE I don't think he considers how much damage it does when one the trusted experts opts for the language of optimism and reduced concern versus the need for continued vigilance and precaution. Time after time his optimism has been wrong, and he forgets that few people are willing to go back and forth to caution. Each "mission accomplished" post just makes it harder to fight mutations, prevent long COVID, and ensure equity for the immunocompromised.
@BE He actually blocked me on Twitter for gently pointing out his criticism of "presence pessimism" had been wrong and the pessimists had been correct about the rapid mutation of the virus. I couldn't believe it. I thought scientists were supposed to be open and objective.
He hasn't turned to the dark side though. He has consistently advocated for measures to reduce transmission. That's a lot better than almost everybody, so I'll take that, even though I don't share the optimism for the near term.