Here we can see how the exclusion of emotions as an obviously real, tangible sense and feelings of conscience can be problematic if we are trying to understand human nature and tend to build loving relationships. To understand the world we must put into equation our emotions because we are emotional beings. By using just our intellect, we can relativise and justify almost anything and in doing so we are completely illogical.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5wuB_p63YM

Chomsky: We should base our laws and justice on what we learn about human nature.

Foucault: We are limited by our perspective. We are liable to get human nature wrong like we did historically.

Chomsky: We should attempt and see how we are limited and what we are able to do.

Foucault: We take great risks by acting on limited knowledge.

Chomsky: We take great risks by not acting. We have to build our model under uncertainty as we go.

Foucault: I don't believe we can do it.

The end.

+++ +++ +++

Doubt - great as a tool for questioning, doing experiments and discovering the truth -- problematic as a tool of the justification of our fear and inaction from it.