@ted @paperdigits @inkscape

Hey, it was meant to be an irony. Except for the few, pure FOSS evangelists, most services (or corporations) hide behind Open Source. Mostly PR to make it look good when, in fact, they care about profit. We use the .com extension so we can onboard the few projects that use a closed source license. The .org will be 100% for "Open Source," but it will continue to rely on .com to support this project. Or we can implement a good filter for open-source. For your consideration, the "FOSS" acronym is probably the only argument against FossHub.