Woot, extended 2 more job offers today, one Jr. and one Sr. I suspect there are at least 3 more people in the pipeline I will be hiring. All from this one post.
That leaves at least 10 out of 15 positions open for anyone still looking for a job!
We also just donated another $5K to our open-source fund. This will go to paying open-source contributors on our projects bounties for completing certain tasks. Very excited by that as well. We are even using it on interviews for code projects so in a sense we are paying people to take interviews with us even if they dont get the job through those bounties. I am getting some interesting reactions with that one.
#Fedihire #Job #jobs #hiring #Programming #IT #AI #AGI #KnowledgeGraphs #semanticweb #ML #chatgpt
Threads don’t let me start new lines with unicode e.g “ or 🖐 unless I write first character in ascii, then in unicode, then delete ascii, making the unicode first.
But they at least have beside Mute/Block e.g. Restrict option or forbidden words or orders of magnitude more normal folks just wanting to have some fun.
@bperruche@mstdn.social I’m not implying what you imply ;), only how your posts can be interpreted.
Those are not the same things.
I’m not jumping to conclusions, those are not conclusions but my impressions of your writing.
Ask yourself one question: who cares someone has a hole in a sweater or dirty shoes?
“A bag from LV will not help much if your white sneakers are covered in dirt or you have a hole in your sweater.”
A bag from Lui Vuitton will not help in what?
Mine impressions are not your judgments or your thoughts or misquotes, only a reaction to your uptight ass phrasing.
@bperruche@mstdn.social did I misquote you somewhere?
That’s how I see your judgment of holes in others’ clothes or dirty shoes—you treat those like they could be better which implies, plainly, they are not good enough already.
Are you saying dirty shoes or a hat are ok? If yes, then, indeed, I misunderstood your nitpicking of others outfits.
@freemo what about predictable (in an information sense: we can compress and predict their views easily) accounts like e.g. Greenpeace. That push the same propaganda not based on evidence or generic life coaches saying drinking a lot of water is good for me or incels claiming white men have the worst life on this planet?
Should I take my time and discuss with them, every one of them, every time, before I block? xD
It's not my fault, fediversum offers only two tools: mute and block. Even Threads offer a bigger spectrum.
Konto tymczasowe.