Nadia Sarai Corral-Frias @NSCorralFrias@qoto.org

Now live! "Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective" is in the Journal of Trial and Error special issue on the consequences of the scientific reform movement.

We argue qualitative researchers use a broad range of strategies to ensure transparency and rigor, and the open science movement would benefit from their inclusion!

https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/rethinking-transparency/release/1

Read the special issue as it develops: https://journal.trialanderror.org/special-issue-consequences-of-the-scientific-reform-movement

#qualitative #OpenScience #AcademicChatter

A systematic review preregistration template is now available on OSF, the first of several community-developed templates to be added.

Key contributions from Olmo van den Akker and @matherion in conceiving the template, and
@katiecorker getting it included.

More information in this preprint:

https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/3nbea/

If you are an international scholar (or are doing global research) feel free to drop by the International Scholars meet-up organized by the @SRAdolescence International Committee on Thursday night at #SRA2023! We are really looking forward to meeting you! Please RT.

Una cordial invitación a les investigadores internacionales que estén en #SRA2023 para que nos acompañen el jueves a las 6 pm y puedan conocer al Comité Internacional de @SRAdolescence. Por favor compartan esta información.
---
RT @luciamawe
If you are an international scholar (or are doing global research) feel free to drop by the International Scholars meet-up organized by the @SRAdolescence International Committee on Thursday night a…
https://twitter.com/luciamawe/status/1645528970862141441

COS needs a lesson planning consultant from now to July (up to 40 hrs total, US$100/hr) to prepare instructional materials for a train-the-trainer model for existing open science modules.

If you are interested, please send a CV and info about your curriculum/pedagogy work to huajin@cos.io

Dear Mastodons!
I am leading a paper on Open Science in the developing world, this paper will be published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. Here is our open call: https://www.dropbox.com/s/z78917uwkd601rs/Open%20Science%20in%20Developing%20Countries_AMPPS.pdf
Please spread the word to colleagues who are promoting open science or related work in developing countries. Please DM me or send me email (hcp4715 AT gmail Dot com) if you have any questions!

Submitted my first #postdoc paper together with @bingellab @sfb_trr289 today (forgot how intense the days before submission can be)!

Dear journal, pls don't desk reject ✨ Will share more about it soon! 😁

For now, automatic email message on and some days of rest coming up! 💆‍♀️

ICYMI: Registration and proposal submissions for the SIPS annual conference in Italy in June are now open! Submissions are due March 1 and early registration ends April 1!

https://www.improvingpsych.org/SIPS2023/

#SIPS2023 #OpenScience #Psychology #Metascience #SocialScience #AcademicChatter

What is your favorite non-experimental study? Bonus points if it's in psychology, but any social science field is welcome!

#Psychology #Sociology #Anthropology #Education #Research #AcademicChatter

SIPS people--where do you gather on social media if you are using Twitter less?

If you have an open community outside of Twitter, in line with the SIPS mission (https://improvingpsych.org/mission/), please share here so SIPS people can find you.

Please share:
-- Communities on Facebook, Slack, Discord etc.
-- Hashtags on Mastodon
-- Other ideas

Also, remember that SIPS has a Slack channel.

#OpenScience #SIPS2023

You can find more information on our website (https://forrt.org/reversals/) & you can head over to our master google doc containing all the instructions you need: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B14wGIemTP6OL5upjh93fCqjly5MNANHtXixSD_Yl18/edit

There you also find info on contribution & authorship! ✨

Need more information about the event or reversals? Get in contact with
@helenahartmann or join us at #FORRTReversals
@FORRT ! ✨

See you hopefully on January 26th! ♥️

We at the @inter_act_lab are excited to continue to work and improve this intervention in 2023 with school partners in Latin America

@eikofried If you are a senior scientist, I'd consider suggesting alternative reviewers among qualified experts who are more junior scientists and scientists from less known places (especially from LMIC countries and other underrepresented groups of reviewers). By doing this you help diversifying the reviewer pool and providing valuable service to the community, and this is the time investment well spent

Too often Black folks, many times #BlackWomen, are tasked with being the voice of #DEI reason in their organization.

Where are those 2020 #diversity initiatives and commitments today? Are those employees even with the company still? Or did they #burnout after realizing their efforts were falling on deaf organizational ears? 🤔 😣

Sharing from #LinkedIn #BlackMastodon #Diversity

I’m happy to announce that we won a grant to improve #REPOPSI!

REPOPSI is an Open Access repository of psychological instruments that we started almost 3 years ago as sort of a passion project at our Lab, with no funding. So proud of how far we’ve come.💙

Thanks EOSC Future & RDA Europe for this opportunity!

You can read more here: https://www.facebook.com/LiraLab.Bgd/posts/pfbid02UfFr2HgVFCknRbktrbPcX5NHGKLGJkrf8SJ79U1RDXdpg3Fk1xPmWeAcuXHTbf8Kl

Or here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lira-lab-bgd_repopsi-openscience-openaccess-activity-7011683708596293632-VQ6t?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

#OpenScience #OpenAccess #OpenResearchData

Steven Roberts had the guts to make public the shitty editorial practices of Fiedler at PoPS - amazing bravery. For each public case there are 50+ that go unreported (for good reason). There is *so little* accountability for editors, & some of them are *so bad*. Many eds act in ways that are corrupt, bigoted, & unprofessional. Time to make editors accountable: publish decision letters & reviews, or at the very least give authors explicit right to share them publicly.