Pausal Živference @PausalZ@qoto.org

@jacd Agreed! I still think the concept of randomization and mimicry has utility. Descriptive epi is a lot easier when we have a random sample

@mike_johansen it once took me 2+ months to figure out an error in a simulation. That error was a single line that converted a float to an integer

@Tim_P_Morris also just randomly came across this paper
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36271175/

@Tim_P_Morris thinking a little more about it, the (non-)collapsibility difference probably has to do with the relationship between PH and AFT for the Weibull:
\beta_{PH} = -\gamma \beta_{AFT}

@gailbear my gripe is that the first word isn't capitalized!

@Tim_P_Morris is it 1, 2, or both?!

PascalCaseIsBest
snake_case_is_also_good
camelCaseAnnoysMe
sPoNgEcAsEiSbAd

@mike_johansen I do wish the US would change our culture regarding going to work/school while symptomatic. I think that would be another great iterative improvement

@chelseaparlett MARS

#EpiVerse #statistics #biostatistics

daily reminder: fewer lines of code is not necessarily better code

@pwgtennant we also beat those pesky epistemiologists

#EpiVerse #Stats

@Tim_P_Morris @PWGTennant lol I can't work that fast

@PWGTennant it's a little dated, but https://github.com/pzivich/Python-for-Epidemiologists

@PWGTennant makes sense to me!

@mallinson I'm not sure. The reason I am asking is that it is actually recommended by the ICMJE

When you submitting to a different journal after rejection, do you include previous reviewer comments with your submission?