Lucid, clear explanation (as is usual from @xriskology) of the grave risk posed by utopians with power & money:

1. #Utopian visions are inherently self-rationalizing. Their revolutions can never fail, they can only *be* failed.

2. #Utopianism is more or less always exclusionary. "If the Christian heaven were to include atheists, for instance, it wouldn't be heaven."

#TESCREAL #EffectiveAltruism #EffectiveAccelerationism #AGI

@FeralRobots @xriskology I'd just like to note that Brexit was/is clearly a utopian project (harking back to an idealized English past that never was) and has caused horrendous, ongoing damage in the UK. From a Putinist point of view the Ukraine invasion was a utopian project—to rebuild the pre-1914 Russian Empire and regain past tsarist glories. And so on.

When you visit a utopia, always look for the mass graves and the blank places on the maps that used to be cities.

@cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology "I have never seen a fictional utopia that was distinguishable from hell." – James Blish, more or less

"There were no children, and no animals." – JB, *The Day After Judgement*

That old fascist had his moments.

@ravenonthill @cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology I always figured this applied equally to heaven. Nobody who wants to live anywhere "for eternity" has considered just how long eternity is, even if you consider it equivalent to merely the lifetime of the universe.

@VoxDei @ravenonthill @cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology the only way I could make sense of heaven’s eternity was to think of eternity not as endless time, but as timelessness, as removal from the flow of time. Which would make heaven a single, perfect, timeless moment, without past or future, change or decay.

Doesn’t detract from the rest of the discussion re utopias though.

@daskeit @ravenonthill @cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology Yeah, but if time isn't passing, how are you experiencing it? If you can think, time is passing in some form, and at that point it's probably worse because it'll take you about ten minutes to get bored, and then you're trapped.

@VoxDei @ravenonthill @cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology

I’m not sure we *could* conceptualise what it would be like to exist outside time - maybe because time, like space, is a Kantian synthetic a priori concept; or maybe for much the same reasons underlying Nagel’s essay asking what it’s like being a bat.

The point being the inability to visualise it isn’t a refutation, it just means we’re inherently limited in what we can understand based on our own experience.

Follow

@daskeit @ravenonthill @cstross @FeralRobots @xriskology

Is it? I'm not a philosopher, I haven't read Kant et al, so maybe I'm way off. But it seems to me that all the perception of time passing is, is the perception that event B follows event A (whether or not it actually does).

The actual nature of time and what we would perceive in its absence is irrelevant to the question of whether we would eventually get bored, as long as our brains continued to process as before (and therefore we would perceive time whether it existed or not).

And if they didn't continue to process as before (much more likely, IMO!) then we have ceased to be human. At that point, you have died and been replaced by something that just thinks it's you.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.