@davidho I don't understand how the Royal Society doesn't realise how much damage it did to their reputation to admit him in the first place.
Even before all of the fascist stuff, he was not a scientist, not a researcher. His contributions to science and engineering were that he was a rich person who funded some work.
Making him a FRS made it very clear that it's not an institution for scientists, it's an institution for plutocrats.
It used to be that being a FRS was something to aspire to an a scientific career. Now it's an easy decline if offered, because who would want to be associated with an institution like that?
They could just kick him out.
I need to be very clear, that the push towards "vibe coding" - that is, deliberately deskilling people - is because AI code assistants are an (increasingly expensive) subscription service.
If you know how to code, you can just write Python, C, Java, R, PHP, whatever for free and make things. You may not own the tools of production, but at least you're not renting them.
If you have been deskilled so you only know how to vibe code, you will be paying for that privilege forever.
This also goes, by the way, for researchers who are starting to be convinced they don't need to learn how to be scientists anymore, because "the AI" can just do the science for them. Nope.
Humans independently edit Wikipedia for humans. They don’t have any Ads or cannot be bullied into removing content. Wikipedia is free from AI slop. No wonder tech bros with AI companies want to eliminate it so that their fake AI text generator can show or push propaganda. Please do not let Wikipedia die. It is an independent source and far more reliable than Gen AI companies. It is a real shame that it comes to this.
Dear Canada
You are going to be given every excuse not to vote.
You'll be told there is already record turn out. You'll be told, the polls already favor the conservatives, losing. You will be told, that exit polls favor someone else. You may even be told, that it looks like someone else has won, before the election is over.
The same thing happen in the United States, and people felt confident, Donald Trump was going to lose. Do not make our mistake.
A Fascist Nazi Dictator story
The Fascist Nazi Dictator was sad. Nobody was buying his NaziCar.
"Maybe the problem is that they don't know it's Nazi enough" so he asked his good friend who was also an authoritarian dictator to help him promote the cars and they rolled them out like it was a hot car lot and had a big photo-op and there was a lot of buzz about it and the Nazi Car received a direct endorsement from a police-state dictator which you'd think would be great; but alas, to his puzzlement, the Nazi Car was less popular than ever before.
He promised to get those who were responsible, whoever they were. "You're not spending money buying my stuff and that's illegal," he said. "Probably. It feels illegal.....Vibes!"
The Nazi Car aficionados and investors, however, were big concerned.
"The problem is that you're spending too much time in government," some said to the dictator. "If you'd come back to the Nazi Car Factory, investors would be reassured."
So our dictator promised that he'd absolutely do that... soon.... someday. But that he'd also be involved at a high level in the remainder of the Reich's leadership and was still very much a Nazi and still wanted to do Nazi shit, orchestrate Nazi behaviors, and had in no way left behind being a Nazi and was in fact writing a definitive book on the subject.
He also owned the largest media conglomerate in Nazi-land and every night he'd get on his soapbox and talk about all the enemies and forces destroying their beloved country. Via this soapbox, he threatened to deport people and accused a lot of people expressing heretical views of being traitors, criminals, terrorists, lawbreakers.
And yet every morning he woke up, flummoxed.
For some inexplicable reason, they still weren't buying the swastikars.
Folks, if someone in the US wants to study a group of people with a a certain condition, they go to an IRB to get permission. They have to decide if the research will use identifiable information. If the data contain identifiers, you essentially always have to get permission from each and every patient, and that permission has to be specific to the exact use of their data.
You don’t “make a registry” of everyone with a disease. Bad people do that. Nazis. Insurance execs. Bad people.
Vaccines are one of the greatest scientific success stories of our time. Vaccination has saved more than 154 million lives in the last 50 years — more than six lives every minute of every year.
Our technical ability to develop vaccines has outpaced our social, political, and financial systems for ensuring their use. Recent moves to strip funding from vaccine-related research are shortsighted and self-harming. As is the use of precious resources to revisit debunked claims of links to autism.
The best vaccine isn’t useful if it is not distributed, or not socially accepted. Vaccine equity and hesitancy remain great challenges. Globalizing antivaccine activism could become our greatest hurdle.
We should not allow misinformation, disinformation, ignorance and defunding to hinder vaccine development, deployment and use.
It is not time to defund, but rather invest in vaccines.
Read our latest editorial in @PLOSBiology: Vaccines work… and do not cause autism
#vaccines #vaccination #immunization #WorldImmunizationWeek #measles #outbreak #vaccinehesitancy
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003143
I’m not even convinced the net productivity change from LLM coding is •positive• if we’re talking about bringing code all the way to production, much less maintaining it. Maybe this time the silver bullet is real, unlike aaaall the past times, but I sure am skeptical.
Yet…here I really •am• seeing those kinds of many-fold gains, gains that (unlike LLMs!) come with •increased• code reliability and maintainability — and from what?
From the slow, hard engineering work of tool improvement we’ve doing all along:
4/
Tell me this:
Why does Silicon Valley keep churning out basically mind-control weapons, one after another?
Social Media algorithms were bad enough, but these language models pretending to be Artificial Intelligence are just out of the ballpark!
Their insatiable hunger for data - and not caring about the quality - is basically the largest attack surface for public opinion manipulation ever.
I’m seeing a lot of people making fun of their incompetence for this, but that’s not what this is. This whole regime is a gang of bullies, headed by a bully, and like all bullies, they’re cowards. Stand up to them, and they whimper away. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/18/business/trump-harvard-letter-mistake.html
Expert in probability, statistics, and data science, with some programming skills as well.
Former academic and current quant trader.