Yes, I do believe our old friends violence, revolt and disorder are necessary in finding a solution to corrupt governance.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-03/climage-change-international-security-risk/11714284
@binsrc a rather weak belief
@namark if that is what you believe troll, then sure.
@binsrc ummm... it's not a belief though it's an opinion... perhaps you meant to say "if that's your opinion, fuck you"?
@namark can I help you with something? Please tell me more about this opinion of yours, I’m all ears.
@binsrc fuck me it is then...
help? I might need some with geometric algebra, if you are so inclined.
@namark so I said “I do believe” when I should have said “in my opinion”, which appeared in your federated timeline, and it’s upset you. Is that correct? I’m genuinely sorry if I offended you, hopefully I can choose better words in the future, ok.
@namark no I’m not offended. Are we having a moment?
Revolution is not peaceful. Curbing free speech on the basis of national security while denying scientific evidence is oppressive. Australian policy makers have a clear agenda to undermine any form of organized dissent under the guise of national security and that’s a calamity worthy of revolt, dissent and violence. This country passed laws making it illegal for software vendors not to break encryption if requested.
@binsrc Well my argument was pretty much hinged upon disorderly, so I can't maintain it if we are talking about some kind of organized opposition. In that context I'm inclined to believe that more organized people are less violence will be necessary.