+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄 @bonifartius@qoto.org

Apparently, the seat behind "shotgun" is known as "Kurt Cobain."

IDK what’s up with this guy but I am appreciative of his twitter grind day after day because it actually sends out wave after wave of armor-piercing anti-boomer mental glacis penetrators like this

#gaming #life with #cats #memes

@TurboNormie Funny how these same types demand we put our name and addresses out there meanwhile have big tech scrub their own info the point where they might as well be anons.

A good little writeup here: theamericansun.com/2022/10/06/the-fed-made-this-trap/

I meant to get this post up last month. I finished up the final draft last night, just as Rekieta Law was terminated on YouTube. I'm thankful I was able to add all the Odysee mirrors for those citations; just another reminder of how bad censorship is getting on the Internet.

https://battlepenguin.com/politics/the-growing-fight-against-censorship-on-the-web/

@Leaflord @nugger >tfw i dont have any more grandmas
Love them while you got them bros

https://youtu.be/MgjEv5ivdVU

This girls videos are very cozy if you want to learn about some other cultures


As a side note look at these Italians and tell me they don’t look Hispanic

909007ee396f9f204552442f4fb87b0015e5fb23ce0d0e5d1639847d62a665e9.mp4

groovy

@Coyote @EssentialUtinsil @GavriloGrindset @teknomunk
> One of the true evils of religion and government is to regulate things that will weaken the gene-pool by heavily biasing the gene-pool with rules.
I agree and disagree.
The goal of these rules aren't solely for influencing the gene pool. In general they were made to maintain societal/tribe cohesion and of course have power over others.

I don't think it's a biased system, because survivalism/Darwinism isn't based on the strongest who survives as most people think, it's actually based on the one who adapt the best, the one who fits the criteria needed to still be alive against the ods.
Thus the selection in a gene-pool isn't a bias by itself it's just negative or positive selection traits.
For example the rules in Iceland to avoid Down syndrome is probably one of the best examples out there about positive gene-pool selection.

>Incest laws, food supply controls, pharmaceutical regulation (take this, but that drug is a felony). All of it influences the gene-pool for "good," they say, but... has anyone really looked at the results?
You're taking a multi factorial issue and looking at the result ?
Plus all of these weren't made for the sole purpose of just gene selection, but tribe/societal building, negative gene survival is a consequence of these.
Avoiding Incest is obviously a positive thing gene imo.

>food supply controls,
And production, the poisoning of our food sources is greatly influencing the pool badly.

>pharmaceutical regulation (take this, but that drug is a felony)
Besides the obvious money/monopoly reasons behind this, I agree, but one should also consider that these rules also exist to maintain social/tribe cohesion.

>but... has anyone really looked at the results?
As far as I look the second main reason after bad luck for people's death is because of people infected with passive violence.
Societal behavior is the second main selector after genes. If you have a tribe or the leaders of one that lets you die for any reason while you had no negative traits compared to the ones who survived who had a few negative trait but sucked the ass of the leaders what does it tell you ?

>ALL of it prevents evolution of the species
This is still evolution, just not a positive one. Thus making the current human species closer and closer to possible extinction.

>restricting potential and bolstering the weak
Indeed.

>That's just one of my 101 reasons tribalism is good, government is bad.
Because you find that the current govs aren't behaving in a tribal manner already ?
What are these gov composed again ? Aren't they composed of a long chain of humans hierarchy ?

create table users (
...
username text unique not null,
password text unique not null,
...