Yes they do, but that's not the correct approach IMO - it identifies the page as a journal, the company as a publisher, and it omits the author. Neither is correct: authorship is a hybrid of prompt, AI, and data; the site is not a journal, but a communication channel like an eMail; and OpenAI is not a publisher since they have no specific agency in the process - and actually exclude accountability via their TOS.
The IMO correct approach is to define a NEW category "Synthesized Communication" and structure the genertaed text like a "Personal Communication":
@misc{chatgpt_2023,
author = {ChatGPT},
title = {Synthesized Communication},
howpublished = {\url{https://chat.openai.com/chat}},
note = {Accessed on 2023-02-01},
}
🙂
#SentientSyllabus #ChatGPT #HigherEd #AI #Education #Authorship