Targeted advertising based on online behavior doesn’t just hurt privacy. It also contributes to a range of other harms. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/03/ban-online-behavioral-advertising
"You really couldn't ask for a better encapsulation of the NFT bezzle: buy an NFT to 'flex' and 'show off you can afford to pay that much.' Ignore the intrinsic value or satisfaction of the underlying work. You're doing this for 'clout.'"
"Right-Clicker-Mentality" by Cory Doctorow https://pluralistic.net/2021/11/08/tina-v-tapas/#spoilsports-r-us
The Twitter account for #TokenizedTweets is suspended but it seems like they're still minting tokens under the original contract: 0x7EE256bdEe18870320666bB61dD3c33C64025c78 on the Polygon PoS chain ( https://polygonscan.com/address/0x7EE256bdEe18870320666bB61dD3c33C64025c78 )
(Confirmed this contract address through this archived tweet: https://web.archive.org/web/20210310044415/https://twitter.com/tokenizedtweets/status/1357829077244215297 )
Latest transaction at time of writing is 0x71a221241e0bfe242c20213a0da30a0314ce0f57e0d9e06b4e3982fa67e2754a ( https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x71a221241e0bfe242c20213a0da30a0314ce0f57e0d9e06b4e3982fa67e2754a )
Sender is 0xFc336c125085F20958d4caa62963e2C693242D43 which appears to be the same address that originally created the contract.
I might just crop my #Twitter profile picture into a hexagon shape #NFT #NFTs #cryptoart https://www.theverge.com/2022/1/20/22893502/nft-twitter-profile-picture-crypto-wallet-opensea-coinbase-right-click
"As a society, we're carving out exceptions to a general standard of representativeness—choosing specific places where we remind each other that it's not allowed. The vast majority of the time, representativeness is not only rampant, it goes completely unnoticed... And it's drowning us."
"It’s Not What It Looks Like: Or, How The Representativeness Heuristic Is Ruining Every Fucking Thing" by Duncan Sabien https://medium.com/@ThingMaker/its-not-what-it-looks-like-cde2c6104455
Conformity is a necessary evil in society, and often there is a debate between a side that does not recognize its necessity and another that does not recognize its evil.
I made this quip on my old Mastodon account (now defunct) but I think it's important enough to repeat (pending a longer blog post expanding on this idea).
The incident involving a certain food item at a certain event that took place two weeks ago is a prime example of the "PETA Principle" (as illustrated in https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/ ) in action: Controversial issues, those that can get many people on different sides involved, get talked about the most, as opposed to issues where people mostly agree. The incident was right on the edge of acceptability with some crucial factual disputes, making this whole thing ripe for arguments.
Facebook is deleting the face recognition-enabling faceprints of over 1 billion users worldwide. This is a testament to all the hard work activists have done to push back against this invasive technology.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/11/face-recognition-so-toxic-facebook-dumping-it
"Lies, Damned Lies, and Fabricated Options" by Duncan_Sabien on Less Wrong https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/gNodQGNoPDjztasbh/lies-damn-lies-and-fabricated-options
On "fabricated options," a type of wishful thinking which imagines choices without undesirable side effects or tradeoffs
In most cases I can bite my tongue because many of the specific proposals/campaigns are reasonable efforts at addressing inequity, but this sort of "rhetorical confusion" makes it difficult for me personally to fully participate in a lot of social-justice movements today.
I'm willing to call systems that perpetuate existing biases "inequitable" ("inequity") because the idea of equity inherently involves existing social context.
Of course one might ask, "Well, why can't the concepts of bias and discrimination involve social context?" Well, they sure can; in fact, most uses of terms like "systemic [bias/X-ism]" seem to.
There's no point in arguing over definitions and I guess it's "just semantics" to a degree. But again, I think the distinction matters.
I think a distinction needs to be made between social systems that introduce new forms of bias/discrimination and those that perpetuate existing forms. The former category is what I think of when it comes to terms like "bias," "discrimination," and the "X-isms." This is why the term " #AlgorithmicBias " in particular rubs me the wrong way: Pretty much every instance I have read about falls under latter category.
"Maybe it’s expecting too much of the American people, but I wish the FDA could lean into this strategy. Grant drugs one-star, two-star, etc approvals... Then you could attach different legal rights and requirements to each of those."
"Adumbrations Of Aducanumab" from Astral Codex Ten
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/adumbrations-of-aducanumab
We have the right to a better digital future - a future where the ambitions of would-be monopolists and their shareholders take a back-seat to fairness, equity, and your right to self-determination. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/utilities-governed-empires
The #ACCESSAct will help everyone that Big Tech has silenced - from BLM to Palestinians, Christian ministries to conservatives - create their online forums, with house rules that reflect their own values and needs. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/07/right-or-left-you-should-be-worried-about-big-tech-censorship
"13 important points in the campus & K-12 'critical race theory' debate" by by Greg Lukianoff, Adam Goldstein, Bonnie Snyder and Ryne Weiss in "The Eternally Radical Idea" https://www.thefire.org/13-important-points-in-the-campus-k-12-critical-race-theory-debate/
(Side note: The replies to Lukianoff's Twitter thread on the article are a perfect demonstration of one of the reasons why I hate Twitter threads. I gave up trying to follow the discussion under each post. https://twitter.com/glukianoff/status/1409485620389597189 )
Thread from Jason Scott (@textfiles@twitter.com) about the #YouTube #UnlistedVideos change: https://twitter.com/textfiles/status/1408160214558388225
(Mostly unqualified) thoughts on technology and social dynamics from a software developer. Longer thoughts on https://collectedoverspread.tumblr.com/ Formerly @collectedoverspread@mastodon.host