"The insidious nature of such generative #AI models is that they produce plausible sounding #health information in a smooth conversational style, that is at best is generic in nature and at worst completely fictional. The problem is that most people cannot tell the difference between the two." The #ethics of AI is going to be a topic that won't gain traction until either normies start dying in numbers, or techbros start getting sued into oblivion. https://medium.com/@guruduth.banavar/chatgpts-deep-fake-text-generation-is-a-threat-to-evidence-based-discourse-c096164207e0
@zeruch giving outdated advice is one thing (even healthcare professionals do it), but referencing fake scientific articles is evil !
@curiousmind I don't dispute the outdated advice part, but the whole point of health information is hopefully that it tailors towards the person seeking, so generic platitudes, while likely not harmful also won't be helpful, which could certainly still make them harmful by their lack of substance.
If that's the best you can hope for with AI generated documentation, that is a very wobbly platform to bet on.