So wild that The Bible contains a logical inconsistency right in the section where Eve takes the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, and if you take it to its logical conclusion, it undermines the entire premise.

It's like they WANTED you to find the fruit for yourself.
Follow

@cjd Part of the confusion is that there are two different words translated "knowledge" in KJV. The tree is named daath in 2:17, biblehub.com/hebrew/1847.htm while the serpent promises yada in 3:5, biblehub.com/hebrew/3045.htm

The KJV translates daath as "premeditated" in Joshua 20:3,5. The most common context for yada is e.g. 4:1, "and Adam knew his wife".

daath is choosing for yourself. E.g. Exodus 31:3 describes a needed quality of an artist for the tabernacle: able to make his own design choices.

yada is knowing by direct intimate experience. In Genesis 15:8, Abram wants some tangible evidence or token of God's promise.

So - the tree is indeed a test. Satan subtly alters what God actually said. Many think Adam may have exaggerated the prohibition with "neither shall you touch it".

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.