I had an interesting discussion with a friend the other day which included this breakdown of "how do I derive moral conclusions?" The conversation topic was immigration and the Abrego Garcia case. It's not a formal logical proof, but I found the process of working this out and writing it down interesting.
Given:
-God is a real, personal agent who cares about right and wrong in the universe.
-Christian values and morality derive from God's (these are found in many places but best codified and collected in the Bible).
-The Bible clearly teaches the value, dignity, and worth of each human life.
-The United States has traditionally based its laws, regulations, and political structure on that principle ("all men are created equal," with the obvious caveat that actual practice has differed widely from principle in many times and in many ways).
-The United States has traditionally operated on extensions of that principle ("no man is above the law," "equal treatment under the law," "innocent until proven guilty," etc.; again, caveat about stated ideals vs. actual practice).
Conclusions:
-Therefore, everyone under the jurisdiction of US law deserves (and in many cases has a legal right to) due process.
-Therefore, even illegal immigrants deserve due process in their deportation proceedings.
Marie Antoinette was executed on this day in 1793. Described by one of her tutors, "her character, her heart, are excellent" and "more intelligent than has been generally supposed," but "she is rather lazy and extremely frivolous, she is hard to teach."
Therefore, do your homework or you'll be executed before age 40.